From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC3EA057B;
	Thu,  2 Apr 2020 14:51:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD532BCE;
	Thu,  2 Apr 2020 14:51:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com
 [209.85.208.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54F7FFA;
 Thu,  2 Apr 2020 14:50:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id r24so3102927ljd.4;
 Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=NYDAE4LslCP0ip77RqXn9frju4ss5toJWBTmU+nsDAc=;
 b=ZRU8+K/hfiISws9EmIVrYwLHLZnjzxnDxPdquhQQXqTXm95+CtU+thjABuLqXQrkkG
 7v4d+i8YFgSHp3EzpZox4dHMFT200B4nE/SAIMfuIiTTepGh4QLECYoL0pY7Z8ZbIYc+
 8YULAfxPNZl5L/Xnjka6kNE5LyztDoxWYgA0sGF2+z2us2zmBGkhsPynTFzllLzErqmg
 X4G+tNDUvaoIO3W4n5zbIEi9AiYeo7LktxjGyVCXQXJ2axw8mQhk7/gjxOzIqGlfxS5h
 AOWc1rZmaTk1PHMWgUU1CpirNaAvIJ3VlgsZQO+/7LwUjTeVcoKGFLGsR1k5NEsoZ5vz
 wDfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=NYDAE4LslCP0ip77RqXn9frju4ss5toJWBTmU+nsDAc=;
 b=UEAE+L9a1VbrYw0BgD+1sw3UzvgSttBDNwAVBJiCQiPZYTkHB4T504/cOVzt9Xsbs8
 v1jTrIBF2lw4RpweeB9Rj3Q0OPVgj9Cu1eeeqIArfQmILsdUex3cHJTy7QGFocDBoqRl
 uOboAA6RpzkMf7T1f3b3myIV1crVKfWNo7/40ulvDMzv997omj9TaWvC4iibr091h7ZC
 CAnEYggkoG+1+/x8uZa+EQXEHHlD4XPW8e8sIOU1M0b7kA96pRZTxCcowxcSVwYVZVIi
 B3n/95GdrnrSvGa292RLXdZCzonx0Xt7yBSuwXf1zBmy3ECjok4wvnoFMVwSk9NxAwlI
 dUKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZJC5mtOr2TBKiBxMDsTqUhOmfw14R5g4OBkatU2rd3bpQSa51C
 9JVl6l6+ztxhEEPz2XDgUwD9L3CIXcXz4AUqQUTGjQ7lArw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIozJ11pI1XWrngctlDNbioixCNLXBGe5Nb5tqA7eVyG3U/jUatTe9njpbCrQHPQ+QvDEiWQ3GMUkLqWj5n3aQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96c4:: with SMTP id d4mr2017523ljj.19.1585831858334;
 Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Venumadhav Josyula <vjosyula@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:21:50 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+i0PGWGvjdiHn4e2uMFOQsusALJX7DPQB5W6rygAfFu+cekmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>, dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Using rte_lpm as standalone library w/o mempools or dpdk
	infra
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi All,

Idea is following
   - create lpm in one process where only rte_lpm and bare minimum is
acessible. Addition into this table will also happen in this process
context.
   - Now in the packet processing context based ip of packet the lookup
will happen in the lpm created.

Is above possible. Please task / Process in which lpm created or lpm
entries added, does not do anything with respect to rte_eal.

Any pointers, will really be appreciated.

Cheers,
Venu