Hello, I saw two comments, and the first one " Please add: stable@dpdk.org to the Cc list" then I added stable@dpdk.org to Cc. Would you like me to add it to the commit? Second one : “Set the maximum reclamation size to user provided value” I set this comment to the header. I thought it was more meaningful in the header. If you want also, I can insert it in the description part. Do I miss something else? On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:34 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli < Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Abdullah, > I do not see the changes I suggested in this version. > > > On May 13, 2024, at 5:00 AM, Abdullah Ömer Yamaç > wrote: > > > > In the previous implementation, the maximum reclamation size was set > > to RTE_HASH_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX and it was not configurable. This patch > > uses the configuration argument to set the maximum reclamation size. > > > > Fixes: 769b2de7fb52 ("hash: implement RCU resources reclamation") > > Cc: dharmik.thakkar@arm.com > > Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli > > Cc: Yipeng Wang > > Cc: Sameh Gobriel > > Cc: Bruce Richardson > > Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin > > > > Signed-off-by: Abdullah Ömer Yamaç > > --- > > lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c > > index 9cf94645f6..f7f0fdfd21 100644 > > --- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c > > +++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c > > @@ -1557,6 +1557,7 @@ rte_hash_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_hash *h, struct > rte_hash_rcu_config *cfg) > > if (params.size == 0) > > params.size = total_entries; > > params.trigger_reclaim_limit = cfg->trigger_reclaim_limit; > > + params.max_reclaim_size = cfg->max_reclaim_size; > > if (params.max_reclaim_size == 0) > > params.max_reclaim_size = RTE_HASH_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX; > > params.esize = sizeof(struct __rte_hash_rcu_dq_entry); > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > >