DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
To: Dean Marx <dmarx@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: probb@iol.unh.edu, npratte@iol.unh.edu, luca.vizzarro@arm.com,
	 yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
	 paul.szczepanek@arm.com, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/3] dts: VXLAN gpe support test suite
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:18:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAA20USe4OA3+MM0DEXiF8oeMs7b8-5NoQW1pj-j_=LNAqs-9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240725162325.20933-3-dmarx@iol.unh.edu>

This all makes sense to me and looks good to me, I just had one
suggestion about verification below.

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:23 PM Dean Marx <dmarx@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Test suite for verifying vxlan gpe support on NIC, as well as expected
> behavior while sending vxlan packets through tunnel
>
> Signed-off-by: Dean Marx <dmarx@iol.unh.edu>
> ---
>  dts/tests/TestSuite_vxlan_gpe_support.py | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 dts/tests/TestSuite_vxlan_gpe_support.py
>
> diff --git a/dts/tests/TestSuite_vxlan_gpe_support.py b/dts/tests/TestSuite_vxlan_gpe_support.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..981f878a4c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/dts/tests/TestSuite_vxlan_gpe_support.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +# Copyright(c) 2024 University of New Hampshire
> +
> +"""VXLAN-GPE support test suite.
> +
> +This suite verifies virtual extensible local area network packets
> +are only received in the same state when a UDP tunnel port for VXLAN tunneling
> +protocols is enabled. GPE is the Generic Protocol Extension for VXLAN,
> +which is used for configuring fields in the VXLAN header through GPE tunnels.
> +
> +If a GPE tunnel is configured for the corresponding UDP port within a sent packet,
> +that packet should be received with its VXLAN layer. If there is no GPE tunnel,
> +the packet should be received without its VXLAN layer.
> +
> +"""
> +
> +from scapy.layers.inet import IP, UDP  # type: ignore[import-untyped]
> +from scapy.layers.l2 import Ether  # type: ignore[import-untyped]
> +from scapy.layers.vxlan import VXLAN  # type: ignore[import-untyped]
> +from scapy.packet import Raw  # type: ignore[import-untyped]
> +
> +from framework.params.testpmd import SimpleForwardingModes
> +from framework.remote_session.testpmd_shell import TestPmdShell
> +from framework.test_suite import TestSuite
> +
> +
> +class TestVxlanGpeSupport(TestSuite):
> +    """DPDK VXLAN-GPE test suite.
> +
> +    This suite consists of one test case (Port 4790 is designated for VXLAN-GPE streams):
> +    1. VXLAN-GPE ipv4 packet detect - configures a GPE tunnel on port 4790
> +        and sends packets with a matching UDP destination port. This packet
> +        should be received by the traffic generator with its VXLAN layer.
> +        Then, remove the GPE tunnel, send the same packet, and verify that
> +        the packet is received without its VXLAN layer.
> +    """
> +
> +    def set_up_suite(self) -> None:
> +        """Set up the test suite.
> +
> +        Setup:
> +            Verify that we have at least 2 port links in the current test run.
> +        """
> +        self.verify(
> +            len(self._port_links) > 1,
> +            "There must be at least two port links to run the scatter test suite",
> +        )
> +
> +    def send_vxlan_packet_and_verify(self, udp_dport: int, should_receive_vxlan: bool) -> None:
> +        """Generate a VXLAN GPE packet with the given UDP destination port, send and verify.
> +
> +        Args:
> +            udp_dport: The destination UDP port to generate in the packet.
> +            should_receive_vxlan: Indicates whether the packet should be
> +                received by the traffic generator with its VXLAN layer.
> +        """
> +        packet = Ether() / IP() / UDP(dport=udp_dport) / VXLAN(flags=12) / IP() / Raw(load="xxxxx")
> +        received = self.send_packet_and_capture(packet)
> +        print(f"Received packets = {received}")
> +        has_vxlan = any(
> +            "VXLAN" in packet.summary() and "xxxxx" in str(packet.load) for packet in received

Scapy actually allows for checking if a layer exists in a packet using
the real types in a few different ways. You could use
packet.haslayer(VXLAN), or you could do basically the same as what you
have without the string comparison if you do `VXLAN in packet`. This
might end up being a little shorter and it saves you from having to
deal with the string provided from the packet summary.


> +        )
> +        self.verify(
> +            not (has_vxlan ^ should_receive_vxlan), "Expected packet did not match received packet."
> +        )
> +
> +    def test_gpe_tunneling(self) -> None:
> +        """Verifies expected behavior of VXLAN packets through a GPE tunnel."""
> +        GPE_port = 4790
> +        with TestPmdShell(node=self.sut_node) as testpmd:
> +            testpmd.set_forward_mode(SimpleForwardingModes.io)
> +            testpmd.set_verbose(level=1)
> +            testpmd.start()
> +            testpmd.udp_tunnel_port(port_id=0, add=True, udp_port=GPE_port, protocol="vxlan")
> +            self.send_vxlan_packet_and_verify(udp_dport=GPE_port, should_receive_vxlan=True)
> +            testpmd.udp_tunnel_port(port_id=0, add=False, udp_port=GPE_port, protocol="vxlan")
> +            self.send_vxlan_packet_and_verify(udp_dport=GPE_port, should_receive_vxlan=False)
> --
> 2.44.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-26 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-25 16:23 [RFC v1 0/3] VXLAN-GPE " Dean Marx
2024-07-25 16:23 ` [RFC v1 1/3] dts: add UDP tunnel command to testpmd shell Dean Marx
2024-07-26 20:18   ` Jeremy Spewock
2024-07-25 16:23 ` [RFC v1 2/3] dts: VXLAN gpe support test suite Dean Marx
2024-07-26 20:18   ` Jeremy Spewock [this message]
2024-07-25 16:23 ` [RFC v1 3/3] dts: conf schema VXLAN gpe support Dean Marx

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAA20USe4OA3+MM0DEXiF8oeMs7b8-5NoQW1pj-j_=LNAqs-9A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dmarx@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=luca.vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=npratte@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).