From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B3D156 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:41:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e16so5568052qcx.20 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:42:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YGc5eD9/v/G+R8DyvO6N9y5AJqrprFuvvIH3EmXqHcg=; b=cT31StnAwzFS+I0xl8lfLjp1qTUNbtDxHQePrtQg1Vm+YHwzAymrQBsBYx2ZfMJk8u J89UW3xw9REWhgwGwev+y4ssKDInUxQqIQ+QESrP0O6umlT1ZWtg+q87du3ILGwZ+ein pACsOQ4p4C2mo1QcXa9h6vt3+LjCxQE/Y7N9s/mXCUHjTC4F8VxVTXAwnmUfoV2Z+qI+ FSWX3NC0ZFL9mqpEEKF0AfyBBYCLf8oHSzVvCl5DWHbn3LMF9yODSEWG5O/I67rXBcmW ZBMQk8TVLwzy+e64j5NRoOPAy/7Fdw+w8NfT8yHPma4HbC7qxDc7+sC7SiZsisuussGm +gxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.120.6 with SMTP id b6mr4287918qar.11.1383727358806; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:42:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.27.4 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:42:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5278C412.4000204@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 12:42:38 +0400 Message-ID: From: Alexander Belyakov To: Prashant Upadhyaya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Surprisingly high TCP ACK packets drop counter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:41:45 -0000 Hello, On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya < prashant.upadhyaya@aricent.com> wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > > > I am also wondering like Olivier =E2=80=93 yours is a nice testcase and s= etup, > hence requesting the information below instead of spending a lot of time > reinventing the test case at my end. > > If you have the time on your side, it would be interesting to know what i= s > the number of packets per second received inside your application on each > of your 4 queues individually in both the usecases =E2=80=93 with and wit= hout RSC. > > There is even packet distribution among all RX queues in both cases with and without RSC. Regards, Alexander