DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
	dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	 "Walker, Benjamin" <benjamin.walker@intel.com>,
	David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	 "Govindharajan, Hariprasad" <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>,
	 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
	 Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	 Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>,
	Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>,
	 "Yu, PingX" <pingx.yu@intel.com>,
	"Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
	 Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 "Peng, Yuan" <yuan.peng@intel.com>,
	"Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:56:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAATJJ0+KG+kBR-oG3Oe-snHEZjybxhqK=EqRXUNCSsdmGDXRSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfc3280e-3325-ec49-4ed8-e3b1e931aee9@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 1:03 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/06/2021 11:29, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > On 10/06/2021 11:05, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:05 AM Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Christian,
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:49 AM
> >>>> To: dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
> >>>> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Abhishek Marathe
> >>>> <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>;
> >>>> Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> >>>> <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> >>>> <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> >>>> <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> >>>> <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin
> >>>> Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>;
> >>>> Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> >>>> <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> >>>> <pezhang@redhat.com>; Yu, PingX <pingx.yu@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q
> >>>> <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; NBU-
> >>>> Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan
> >>>> <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:52 AM Christian Ehrhardt
> >>>> <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is version 2 of the list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.9.
> >>>>> Thanks to plenty of helpful developers we've collected a few more
> >>>>> backports by now and sorted out a few rare compile time issues that were
> >>>> found with -rc1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The planned date for the final release of 19.11.9 is now 18th of June.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> >>>>> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
> >>>>> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.9-rc2
> >>>>
> >>>> Unfortunately there were further build issues with new suse kernels.
> >>>> The fix for some of them, now breaks others :-/ The final fix didn't finalize
> >>>> yet, but as a TL;DR it means there will be a -rc3 down the road.
> >>>>
> >>>> I beg your pardon for the extra work.
> >>>> If you are testing non-suse and are already deep into the tests you likely can
> >>>> continue that.
> >>>> If you didn't start your tests yet then I'd recommend holding back until -rc3
> >>>> exists.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I see some build failures with gcc 11. Do we expect this release to support it?
> >>
> >> I have added all that were targeted at stable@dpdk, but I remember
> >> that Kevin mentioned a few missing in 20.11.x due to the submissions
> >> missing to go to stable@dpdk.
> >> The same could be the case here.
> >> @Kevin could you have a look at 19.11 and if there are some missing
> >> point me to the commits to pick up?
> >>
> >> @Ali - if you have a particular bug signature that might help to
> >> identify the right patch.
> >>
> >
> > They will all note 'GCC' (or gcc) in the commit msg. Most will have an
> > example of the 'warning' they resolved too. There was also bugzillas
> > opened for them all i think, which note the fixing commit. So if you
> > find any issues when building, you could cross-reference between warning
> > in commit/warning in Bz and fixing commit. Of course there may be some
> > new issues pop up in older code that was later changed/replaced in main.
> >
> > There was also 2 commits needed for clang 12 support (my bad for missing
> > tags on these).
>
> > 5ac070cfed test/cmdline: silence clang 12 warning
> ^ just sent backport of this with upstream commit and correct tag
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/20210610110028.230803-1-ktraynor@redhat.com/T/#u

I've already applied it a few hours ago, but the content is the same

> > 414245bbc5 test/cmdline: fix inputs array
> ^ this one was already merged on 19.11 and 20.11 branches

Yes, as are all the other GCC 11 fixes we discussed.

Thank you Kevin!

> >
> >>> I also see some doxygen errors with version 1.9.1 in Fedora Rawhide. Will open a Bugzilla ticket.
> >>
> >> Rawhide builds of 19.11.x were broken for a while now, but yeah filing
> >> the bug surely is the right path.
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ali
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-04  5:52 Christian Ehrhardt
2021-06-10  8:48 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-06-10  9:05   ` Ali Alnubani
2021-06-10 10:05     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-06-10 10:29       ` Kevin Traynor
2021-06-10 10:58         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-06-10 11:18           ` Ali Alnubani
2021-06-10 11:02         ` Kevin Traynor
2021-06-10 13:56           ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2021-06-11  8:55             ` Jiang, YuX
2021-06-14  5:20               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-06-14 12:21                 ` Luc Pelletier
2021-06-10 11:00   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-06-15  3:17 ` Pei Zhang
2021-06-15  7:05   ` Christian Ehrhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAATJJ0+KG+kBR-oG3Oe-snHEZjybxhqK=EqRXUNCSsdmGDXRSg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=benjamin.walker@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=juhlee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=pezhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=pingx.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yuan.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).