From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com (mail-qk0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B30558E for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:22:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id s5so20559261qkd.0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:22:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KO5NzOgu7v5axs6eLKqEXkVsFTk5s/Cdx3cPjiH7WWA=; b=SSyLHfDGxtKDJzqPuouA8sy5Dm8zShXKrxwQGSUza2d62//3UmGNxQ3qrWqWro7Odv upYra78AHVThGFVgZ+oOwcUcb8a91rrm5/gkP4IgYYUI9hd47LgTwGPZwcBlSXfzQogc gjd6v3kztr2AIKj8xo0XCS3OmjX+/4EMtdEts832Dh+no/fmqYSOIMOVtq53grwGA98d xRTo2UPVVYk7VCi4J8GG9Ngizz4/X0dTpaqC/GKcm0qAwlz4nYDhzICHGLOPJBg12n2Y 2I5ZoENgM3Ef10UEfek6sOEcoVCvBiZo7FBoQvq6pyYfHJBtpXHvv5UCSqVVC/5p/R9T 3FtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KO5NzOgu7v5axs6eLKqEXkVsFTk5s/Cdx3cPjiH7WWA=; b=DpHaleYQq0eb+2JHlEz2JXGENCtQxAPr2iIVuMKuM8Fgvq/sUz6zCJ11l3V4LjYY6a M1jTofCs4Hy1iV29mpHe5inEE8s/jMs9hB+WLEcRi5Vi3+TeNeKJTeb6Lm2haWlfPGbl JnkIzyViE/8mqathxirQ7RdWyPY0EYugJ1EcyLJImOn/YdDw6DyAy5WJRHlFKFahScIF riFM3qXL+26wCkJMqma2YyGOU/kZaIfH3zoF1RSt7rxvEj4uqf0ceZzJ3jqOzIyF36up iiisiDKAITTKPwq/Q6A0XQyDQ/yE/2idUzqeLQM49Iv2BfByYrXDrpya7kZpWwu0mpYO rPNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKPfhNz1lxZPsa0kl0+BBn5d6mwbyEkExgKMmD/zOjXOMPdrdOX9O9hsFXQaSHXsSNn3EtyIV1Nh7FTgL3q X-Received: by 10.55.197.207 with SMTP id k76mr5176191qkl.15.1458134537914; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:22:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.169.6 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:21:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56E95B6E.3070500@6wind.com> References: <1458044751-365-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <56E95B6E.3070500@6wind.com> From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:21:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: Olivier MATZ , Bruce Richardson Cc: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: fix memory leak X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:22:18 -0000 Thanks Oliver, the bad thing was that I forgot to CC dpdk-dev last friday. I just resubmitted correcting that mistake. I think it should now just be down to the re-review and apply of Bruce. Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > > On 03/15/2016 01:25 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > >> Internal lpm structures are not properly freed. Seen with the >> lpm6 autotest. >> >> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz >> --- >> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 3 +++ >> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm6.c | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> > Self-nack, Christian already submitted a series about it: > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11543/ > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11544/ > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11545/ > >