From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com (mail-qk0-f170.google.com [209.85.220.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46E12BDE for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:12:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id v123so64442581qkh.3 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 01:12:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yO7US3fH8r9yV0Ks3IhOs4zifE2viGgfxTgEuh+O4VM=; b=r2hurSCznoeC+qNRG7+LYMzF90DEPdw2dM2dbGNHOV9G+pZbWLXlBOrAcRzjZVnz70 DhQpvIwBRuZM97hulSHotts71MFCa4buV0V7UJX3x4Ono7fsxP0GkMh5Sj1J1UNzUbaq pOYyUgv+E/cCDRPraSiHIXgIYVdGnAsh6CkXAdrgFHVKIZU6QL1UpKEO8Ky6/CpLLWQu xXjv47Ss78ijAnDJaFMVll4U4IaQsgGYVUFCPR8Wqt7P7DcZpkDL7/RxdehHxj+uteK5 I1dbhhjy5v2v3sjng8Ng0qwaAyUsYV74fNM+J/LPum6AROTpuQoaUmeOCa61+00jmW4E 3agw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=yO7US3fH8r9yV0Ks3IhOs4zifE2viGgfxTgEuh+O4VM=; b=Sh1VKtIMg+7dYwvns2nCdpSqHIh1bykkFdrghYqgqarqpoOACGU3ZPmSicLBUn1VN3 D+05+XcYbpxD/ikN0EbXmPSziC5ZAlY9ejHUsfuB1miaCTI1ejI38ZUEAFEnhoo+a1Ok tfV4bC4SJ84iepK1j4coiwwYQwfxpkYnpMjn1OpNoFTNS/puIBzNMDcqK5ETZMnJzVeN n9+jRIwGTVG4xnYPr6K9eZLY/bAH/UnJ148Odad97h/FFeZnXBjZPd3iSJJPdBoylmo0 oohWP3SadJzoZ+j66RL3qFOaaFxCdyQjrFt656la8ScbO0Sxqz330usMcMENNesDxNwR ymUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv8XeG9lDNoK3Bu3yGeQU64N3hW6x1FcO3BYlvsTSRSI8K+phtEO/YcpngEJ75NsyBqIvlC6w4pkDkgx8oX X-Received: by 10.55.125.129 with SMTP id y123mr83267546qkc.204.1470211923264; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 01:12:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.15.193 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 01:11:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1518657.ZZVjD1fj2f@xps13> References: <1470146092-12115-1-git-send-email-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> <7413793.FKEpEWkE5V@xps13> <1518657.ZZVjD1fj2f@xps13> From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:11:32 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon , dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] scripts: make load-devel-config not to appear as executable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:12:04 -0000 sorry, I accidentally dropped dev list in one of my replies, readding. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Given that we should drop the .sh file ending as well as the > executable > > > > flag - both are not needed to source the file. > > > > > > Hmmm, it is still a file containing some shell commands, right? > > > So why removing the .sh extension? > > > > > > > I wanted to discuss on #dpdk today, but everyone seemed busy today. > > So I expected the discussion on file extension to come up on the patch > > submission - which is fine and just as it should be. > > > > My reasoning was primarily to discourage people to think to call it. > > I think it is the contrary: the executable files for users have no > extension. I totally understand that for commands in the path, but that doesn't count here. Could we have anybodies opinion as a tie breaker so I can submit a v2 without RFC then? P.S. I understand there was no objection on changing the file mode - which might be quite unobvious in the diff? -- Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd