From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com (mail-yw0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7172965 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:30:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r9so25876912ywg.0 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:30:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gB5ydmui9mNpOFyqJS+2nry2WdyyEurskPXx+3UzC4M=; b=QfIM8mCXZbB72hbl63iCnFangmzdNPuQHvbl+JpscPeYmERdBkAJdvAROOfDrbGlBs nNANHwJWa7WYipDNIJ6c9cOtvN3HshTj3W5760V3jR3m2nkCWMcw8QlEAZ8KQ61QoXTp 8PFo8yLCbE2yoU9UOhkqlxSoU0+r3DJbPUU/xHraLZJO3/w3mfwaA5s0W3DTsrzBqdji wfnqp7JlEsCZM/TtXSaCkBl2eiJm3dL1maIMRXFA+RjdwcBR6C3mva1FsgDjBrnBul8c I26AvzO1UA4LNxMnv2uL+Cgu/KE+DfxlbtC8i0V5sFzOGAu5CZw2zVMuDNfA0Mt1pASa tEeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gB5ydmui9mNpOFyqJS+2nry2WdyyEurskPXx+3UzC4M=; b=QUMgiPR+xeEKKiyiELp08N3rgx08avmhqFjQ52tPkoNXaD4I8qvTzS6axBbw0VMIiS ttCRE788d1a3KNwrCBrxXyWRMhCm04yTvXsVK9gCviBzovi9S9qoJRoYu2fr/V7HFe/O wTH+rz64Rtf2w9BqJygFwkMwsDMppIgu9LAMEBML66dF0t3kMsDp4y1RmXc0wz2lsZ9g iSSvv15mLzkWwLbymyt0fLqq/DMAD0/kt6Ma03q14Oqfydx0lSvP7W3oIMdJY7CBkDAq l7Re3IlopSucAZ6qwvg43SSNXdmTA5vf6Gw82oTz5Ypmde6bZR7kOOhD1M1oJ7OgNSrs i+mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN9i66TJwzv93HS7GHxQZDn4d9g8aEGAlGdj5Gpj0qGi9VQ5ih6sFjgnuA7IFaOLRO5br/y/d/858MIC4yd X-Received: by 10.129.159.131 with SMTP id w125mr7139683ywg.168.1472628624575; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:30:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.243.194 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:29:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1470309419-4389-1-git-send-email-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> <1470309419-4389-3-git-send-email-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:29:54 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Mcnamara, John" Cc: "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] doc: add basic invocation info for dpdk-pmdinfo X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:30:25 -0000 On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Christian Ehrhardt > > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 12:17 PM > > To: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com; thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; > > dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] doc: add basic invocation info for dpdk- > > pmdinfo > > [...] > > --- a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/index.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/index.rst > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ Sample Applications User Guide > > I think these docs would be better in a "doc/guides/tools" directory. > That would be clearer in terms to the documentation structure and > also in terms of their functionality > I agree that it represents the scope better then, but I was aligning myself to the pdump and procinfo tools that are already there. testpmd is a bit of an outlier, as that already has its own dir. But I assume given the suggestion to move the new ones we would want to move those other two as well then? I thank that would serve consistency then - I'll prep a patch with that as part of the series. [...] free-of-discussion ack to all other suggestions