DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
To: Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	pradeep@us.ibm.com, mendoza1@us.ibm.com,
	 gowrishankar.m@in.ibm.com, kjreilly@us.ibm.com,
	dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector type
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:11:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAATJJ0KNjoueqW3UwDjnRnA7HrJNF-F8f1F7szN9Lj1KeAL_Bw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002401d440dc$df7cae20$9e760a60$@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:44 AM Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Thomas,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. DPDK will definitely be supported by IBM. I think
> Pradeep and the team is working on this. Personally, I don't have enough
> bandwidth to do this, we'll have a discussion internally to decide who will
> take over the maintenance.
>

We have seen you acking packages recently, but that alone .
But we have a new LTS 18.11 ahead and I'd hate to release it without PPC
maintenance.
Did the discussions resolve, if so did you get more time to do it or was
somebody else elected?


Thank you!
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: 2018年8月30日 16:37
> > To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>; Gowrishankar
> > Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Chao Zhu
> > <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; pradeep@us.ibm.com; Alfredo Mendoza
> > <mendoza1@us.ibm.com>; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
> > <gowrishankar.m@in.ibm.com>; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
> > <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Kevin Reilly <kjreilly@us.ibm.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com; Luca Boccassi
> > <bluca@debian.org>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector
> type
> >
> > 29/08/2018 16:37, Christian Ehrhardt:
> > > Why is no-one of IBM/Power world replying at all?
> > > There not even was a "oh yeah, <whatever the content would be>" mail
> > > by them.
> > > Is in fact ppc64 support in DPDK dead or at least "unmaintained"?
> > > This is something that mid term has to be sorted out - I tried to pull
> > > some strings to get attention "there" but so far I'm waiting for a
> reply.
> > > I'd say 18.11 should not be released with a clear re-confirmation of
> > > ppc64 maintainance ppc64 by "someone".
> >
> > I tend to agree.
> >
> > Let's try again:
> >
> > Chao, are you still available for DPDK PPC maintenance?
> >
> > SHOULD WE DECLARE DPDK NOT SUPPORTED ON PPC64?
> >
>
>
>

-- 
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-27 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-21 14:19 Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-22 15:11 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-27 12:22   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-28 11:30     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-28 11:44       ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-28 12:38         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-28 15:02           ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-29  8:27             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-29 13:16               ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-08-29 14:37                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-30  8:36                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-08-30 11:22                     ` Alfredo Mendoza
2018-08-31  3:44                     ` Chao Zhu
2018-09-27 14:11                       ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2018-08-30  9:48                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-30 10:00                     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ppc64: fix compilation of when AltiVec is enabled Christian Ehrhardt
2018-08-30 10:52                     ` Takeshi T Yoshimura
2018-08-30 11:58                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-05 14:15                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-05 21:20                           ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2018-11-07 10:03                             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-07 18:58                               ` dwilder
2018-11-07 21:21                                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-07 23:53                                   ` Pradeep Satyanarayana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAATJJ0KNjoueqW3UwDjnRnA7HrJNF-F8f1F7szN9Lj1KeAL_Bw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gowrishankar.m@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kjreilly@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mendoza1@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pradeep@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).