From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DBF1B43E for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:12:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com ([209.85.210.69]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1g5X1M-0005Vu-OH for dev@dpdk.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:12:00 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id u40-v6so3229216otc.0 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:12:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ye1khIYY9TcI3q8N3NxUTqUpcT1lvUtkSsGbYItcS9w=; b=g3mEZqEwstjFVPz30cuifyuYPcqLsCcD50fS6JuX6hXSorXbtYCZ79JClMfJGcvQnL XTIYm9X7hSiBQK62zFw+yE7sKTiS8g5iqe2CvcE9DNY8j7IV+VS0W0RXzm+tBeqe9wwE Dk9rzIG6p6dxdohIgg4nRJ9unI/aqwOK524Qgr/6PnCDhU0vitgVeQwlmyYje013eQiZ E03TxyBgjCiAr9frPNJOrK7/CT+VF+mG1OFgi+a/gMVLBBr/7ABCxQFZ0mUKq3U1VM8U 8TRgqDAcjz2mZtcdVjVzr15CNDxJd0tFhORObcrH5fqNK+amIekYjSXDoltqI+e/Rq94 dUhg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiiPJvJ3DG6CDNT/QC2UDgcF/EEm6erAiOltBwLqKUtDaHAxmGf NCypc1njsSaPY5pjV7mvsgtW87bzusA70JlN1W4KoWqOdtxWI834HwFFcGhVaGLKvHGIhCf2jn4 CzcIa9MkfKB+U70qQMvABu47jehZo6ldYxyri X-Received: by 2002:a9d:fa4:: with SMTP id d33-v6mr6955841otd.84.1538057519773; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:11:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62wHkszbk+YHo72IQTyK/QGUJXpFuktaH5ZZxX5YQi6Q9RR5eu0lz2Mvqxl3Kb5FUFljSLzakKq6b96ZtP7+r8= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:fa4:: with SMTP id d33-v6mr6955824otd.84.1538057519484; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:11:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180829131605.GJ3695@6wind.com> <3195236.p3PdHVbfnl@xps> <002401d440dc$df7cae20$9e760a60$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <002401d440dc$df7cae20$9e760a60$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:11:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Chao Zhu Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan , pradeep@us.ibm.com, mendoza1@us.ibm.com, gowrishankar.m@in.ibm.com, kjreilly@us.ibm.com, dev , adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, Luca Boccassi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector type X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:12:01 -0000 On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:44 AM Chao Zhu wrote= : > Thomas, > > Sorry for the late reply. DPDK will definitely be supported by IBM. I thi= nk > Pradeep and the team is working on this. Personally, I don't have enough > bandwidth to do this, we'll have a discussion internally to decide who wi= ll > take over the maintenance. > We have seen you acking packages recently, but that alone . But we have a new LTS 18.11 ahead and I'd hate to release it without PPC maintenance. Did the discussions resolve, if so did you get more time to do it or was somebody else elected? Thank you! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > Sent: 2018=E5=B9=B48=E6=9C=8830=E6=97=A5 16:37 > > To: Christian Ehrhardt ; Gowrishankar > > Muthukrishnan ; Chao Zhu > > ; pradeep@us.ibm.com; Alfredo Mendoza > > ; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan > > ; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan > > ; Kevin Reilly > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com; Luca Boccassi > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector > type > > > > 29/08/2018 16:37, Christian Ehrhardt: > > > Why is no-one of IBM/Power world replying at all? > > > There not even was a "oh yeah, " mail > > > by them. > > > Is in fact ppc64 support in DPDK dead or at least "unmaintained"? > > > This is something that mid term has to be sorted out - I tried to pul= l > > > some strings to get attention "there" but so far I'm waiting for a > reply. > > > I'd say 18.11 should not be released with a clear re-confirmation of > > > ppc64 maintainance ppc64 by "someone". > > > > I tend to agree. > > > > Let's try again: > > > > Chao, are you still available for DPDK PPC maintenance? > > > > SHOULD WE DECLARE DPDK NOT SUPPORTED ON PPC64? > > > > > --=20 Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd