From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05982A329E for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:33:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B31A1C29C; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:33:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com (mail-io1-f66.google.com [209.85.166.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128E044C3 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:57:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id q1so19304846ion.1 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:57:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5gdKSR/jTiPdf+N1qK25mQ+BWZExRtnRm8NmN1OWXFc=; b=ers15GqNnBt4Q+QOadReVmAqj/VapY0f4TwaBDrFtjCLrRIJQjuu0SQy48wAxxiDFQ TSjC9BBfvcMULP7vKiM/qgnvwR21fKljXhnT9jMph9ciQRX9L7D7fxJuK6NUx8BslIEB Y6nn67pSdQF/h1E3YFAdvfZnRodLlDzZjYXkY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5gdKSR/jTiPdf+N1qK25mQ+BWZExRtnRm8NmN1OWXFc=; b=NFe5xTn7nINqiGhAAkm/cvObwvQ0EXgftCbwedQKwZJj3SWBbpqX8NvMEVdcf6OCWS 5+8BM9Q73tHYbhB/8ActrbHTLUGMj750gyE2yx0G56iq1874WiLrqwJyRA2+r3B/NeCc a9Kps24L5gkaeoVw/bUTsoP7cG+V1BsepLMkVtKiKGRdrShSkI3AZGSby132zlWlD0i3 1wFp3DZ7tOC4WZ7skJL6oA/llgr+0mb2UiOt7TyDs48JlTLCsuqH5AjKr9rllxuCZllu stdg3DDpjsItCk+C018DRfkfM7QT2INda3OJhJhlM5goAbF3HvxxM4QgKUbGCNBb3/n+ LWow== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUQF+5LKA4K5amv/o7bVqiezURFKJMG10+h8mJYEH0yoUmpHIS/ AgfEXIiH3+s+l5bBVczSo4UY3NLwI1UEJZatyiljXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAova9FPEvKrsTXOZK9UM+LBcvDeuKzlHXUCSmqvyqVuUzYe61OEKvpsg5BJS1rJqlOiTmnohtWGmgW3FIBGk= X-Received: by 2002:a02:c76f:: with SMTP id k15mr947333jao.41.1571731036231; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:57:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191015053047.52260-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <83009bb3-1e0c-a22e-eff8-41a437817cb7@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rajesh Ravi Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:26:39 +0530 Message-ID: To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Cc: Ajit Khaparde , dev@dpdk.org, Jonathan Richardson , Scott Branden , Vikram Mysore Prakash , Srinath Mannam X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:33:20 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add option --iso-cmem for external custom memory X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Anatoly, I tried calling rte_vfio_dma_map() but, it failed for me because vfio_dma_mem_map() failed with error:VFIO support not initialized because: default_vfio_cfg->vfio_iommu_type=NULL ( container_dma_map calls vfio_dma_mem_map with vfio_cfg = default_vfio_cfg ) call sequence: rte_vfio_dma_map() -->container_dma_map() --> vfio_dma_mem_map Regards, Rajesh On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:16 PM Rajesh Ravi wrote: > Thanks Anatoly for prompt response. Sorry for the delayed response, I > took some time to reverify with SPDK. > > Infact, I do want the iommu mapping to be performed. I don't want it to be > bypassed by type1_map() [lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c] for > external memory. > > Then, if I understood correctly, you suggested to call rte_vfio_dma_map() > as an alternative. > > *Context & clarification* > > 1) We 're using DPDK to manage/allocate memory for SPDK through heap API. > > The only DPDK APIs we 're calling are: > A)rte_malloc_heap_memory_add() to add external memory to heap. > B)rte_malloc_heap_get_socket() & rte_malloc_socket() to allocate memory > > * Are you suggesting to make a call to rte_vfio_dma_map() from spdk, in > addition to the APIs listed under 1)A & 1)B instead of modifying DPDK vfio > functions?* > Please confirm, Probably I missed the context and might not have > understood fully. > > > 2) .dma_user_map_func=vfio_type1_dma_mem_map() is called from 2 paths in > dpdk. In either case call to dma_user_map_func() is skipped. > > A) *During the startup, as you said before:* > rte_vfio_setup_device() --> type1_map() > > B)During allocation event: > vfio_mem_event_callback() (type=RTE_MEM_EVENT_ALLOC,..) > -->vfio_dma_mem_map() -->dma_user_map_func() > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > *Conclusion* > > So we have 2 alternatives: > > A) make additional call to rte_vfio_dma_map() API after adding external > memory using rte_malloc_heap_memory_add() API. > > B) remove msl->external check which bypasses call to dma_user_map_func() > in DPDK. > > I modified DPDK functions [Option B) ]. I guess you 're suggesting option > A) > > Please confirm. > > > Regards, > Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:23 PM Burakov, Anatoly < > anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote: > >> On 18-Oct-19 11:54 AM, Rajesh Ravi wrote: >> > + Srinath >> > >> > Thanks Anatoly for reviewing this. Please find my reply inline below: >> > >> > [Anatoly] First of all, what is "iso-cmem"? It doesn't seem to have any >> > defined >> > meaning nor any relation to any existing functionality, and it's not >> > explained anywhere what is "isolated cmem". >> > [Rajesh] I 'll correct commit message to include clearer explanation. >> > _ >> > _ >> > _Context & purpose_ >> > We 're using this to improve SPDK performance. When NVMe completion >> > queues are allocated from a certain memory range, >> > out of order competions completions are enabled with our PCIe and it >> > improves performance. >> > >> > _Usage_ >> > spdk_env_init()-->(calls rte_eal_init(), and then calls >> > )spdk_env_dpdk_post_init() [file: spdk/lib/env_dpdk/init.c] >> > --> spdk_mem_map_init() >> > [lib/env_dpdk/memory.c]-->map_cmem_virtual_area() [this is our custom >> > function] >> > In map_cmem_virtual_area(): we 're mmaping anonymous & private region >> > and then creating iova table which makes iova addresses which fall in >> > custom memory region. >> > Then we call rte_malloc_heap_memory_add() and then allocate NVMe >> > completion queues from this heap. >> > >> > [Anatoly] More importantly, why is this necessary? Type1 map only >> bypasses >> > external segments when adding memory at startup - it doesn't stop you >> > from calling rte_vfio_dma_map() to map the memory with VFIO when you >> > create the segment. >> > [Rajesh] Please correct me if I'm wrong or missing some thing here. >> > A) We wanted to create a heap from which we can allocate dynamically >> > >> > B) I see that type1_map() >> > [file:dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c] getting called once >> > rte_malloc_heap_memory_add()() was invoked. >> > SPDK uses type1 dma map [spdk/lib/env_dpdk/memory.c] >> > vfio_type1_dma_map() is registered for .dma_map_func member >> > [dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c] >> > So type1_map is called. Not sure whether we can change this. >> > >> >> I'm not sure i'm following. You mean you *don't* want this mapping to be >> performed? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Anatoly >> > > > -- > Regards, > Rajesh > -- Regards, Rajesh