DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Liu <dliu@iol.unh.edu>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
	 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V1] testpmd: add eeprom/module eeprom display
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:40:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAuqQpQdyRPQL1psddrRO3fQD6iOiFnWZmGoebrRJpzrgWes4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1d46e0a-e240-d92c-c97c-dbbc6f862351@intel.com>

Yes, that sounds good. What do you think of having the command to be "show
port (port_id|all) (module_eeprom|eeprom)"?

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:00 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:

> On 9/1/2020 8:07 PM, David Liu wrote:
> > Change display message.
> > Add EEPROM dump command
> >   "show port <port_id> eeprom"
> > Add module EEPROM dump command
> >      "show port <port_id> module_eeprom"
> > Commands will dump the content of the
> > EEPROM/module EEPROM for the selected port.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Liu <dliu@iol.unh.edu>
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      |  87 ++++++++++++++
> >  app/test-pmd/config.c                       | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  app/test-pmd/testpmd.h                      |   2 +
> >  doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  14 +++
> >  4 files changed, 229 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > index a037a55c6..71c98dd96 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > @@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void
> *parsed_result,
> >                       "show port
> (info|stats|summary|xstats|fdir|stat_qmap|dcb_tc|cap) (port_id|all)\n"
> >                       "    Display information for port_id, or all.\n\n"
> >
> > +                     "show port (port_id) eeprom \n"
> > +                     "    Display the EEPROM infomation for given
> port_id.\n\n"
> > +
> > +                     "show port (port_id) module_eeprom \n"
> > +                     "    Display the port moudle EEPROM infomation for
> given port_id.\n\n"
> > +
> >                       "show port X rss reta (size) (mask0,mask1,...)\n"
> >                       "    Display the rss redirection table entry
> indicated"
> >                       " by masks on port X. size is used to indicate the"
> > @@ -7594,6 +7600,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showdevice = {
> >               NULL,
> >       },
> >  };
> > +
> > +/* ** SHOW EEPROM INFO *** */
> > +struct cmd_showeeprom_result {
> > +       cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
> > +       cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> > +       cmdline_fixed_string_t type;
> > +        uint16_t portnum;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void cmd_showeeprom_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > +               __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> > +               __rte_unused void *data)
> > +{
> > +       struct cmd_showeeprom_result *res = parsed_result;
> > +
> > +       port_eeprom_display(res->portnum);
> > +}
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showeeprom_show =
> > +       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, show,
> "show");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showeeprom_port =
> > +       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, port,
> "port");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_showeeprom_portnum =
> > +       TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, portnum,
> UINT16);
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showeeprom_type =
> > +       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, type,
> "eeprom");
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showeeprom = {
> > +       .f = cmd_showeeprom_parsed,
> > +       .data = NULL,
> > +       .help_str = "show port <port_id> eeprom",
> > +       .tokens = {
> > +               (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_show,
> > +               (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_port,
> > +               (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_portnum,
> > +               (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_type,
> > +               NULL,
> > +       },
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* ** SHOW MODULE EEPROM INFO *** */
> > +struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result {
> > +       cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
> > +       cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> > +       cmdline_fixed_string_t type;
> > +        uint16_t portnum;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void cmd_showmoduleeeprom_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > +               __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> > +               __rte_unused void *data)
> > +{
> > +       struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result *res = parsed_result;
> > +
> > +       port_module_eeprom_display(res->portnum);
> > +}
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_show =
> > +       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result,
> show, "show");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_port =
> > +       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result,
> port, "port");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_portnum =
> > +     TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result, portnum,
> UINT16);
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_type =
> > +     TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result, type,
> "module_eeprom");
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom = {
> > +     .f = cmd_showmoduleeeprom_parsed,
> > +     .data = NULL,
> > +     .help_str = "show port <port_id> module_eeprom",
> > +     .tokens = {
> > +             (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_show,
> > +             (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_port,
> > +             (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_portnum,
> > +             (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_type,
> > +             NULL,
> > +     },
> > +};> +
>
> Since both commands are simple and related, what do you think merging their
> implementation? This reduces the clutter.
> Please check '#' usage in the 'TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER', and "port
> start|stop|close all" implementation can be sample.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-03 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01 19:07 David Liu
2020-09-02 10:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-03 16:40   ` David Liu [this message]
2020-09-03 18:40     ` Ferruh Yigit
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-09-10  6:00 David Liu
2020-09-10 11:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-10 18:48   ` David Liu
2020-09-10 20:00 ` David Liu
2020-09-01 18:56 David Liu
2020-08-26 19:00 David Liu
2020-08-26 22:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-08-28 13:46   ` David Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAuqQpQdyRPQL1psddrRO3fQD6iOiFnWZmGoebrRJpzrgWes4A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dliu@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).