From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7703DA0350;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:01:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72431BEDD;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:01:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com
 [209.85.167.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB691BEB2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:01:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id u25so11327050lfm.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=Q9ZN33updhL/SNYy66VLfPzn/J80w0bjLV5VTEBbBz4=;
 b=A4M/OS/fGWKi2RxmKP7VM4oOlYmIc1JBJ2LcOK8AkeB0JjLgrpTMgueVWH/yPweZI9
 oJWlWxSSX73sdtEmFkDbSCYgpCbJaheXj2lpgFnliS3Q5BqQx/b4qHUVpUjlh9yl5onj
 DSJN9tBG0Wk7q4ZPHNqdIOuR1dbTHM78ffmAA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Q9ZN33updhL/SNYy66VLfPzn/J80w0bjLV5VTEBbBz4=;
 b=nER8HZQrOfhzy1mhPKlxT3ZY9hUgOXn3VSIMIOKfO+gMmiXxk9yDDGcKTaRNht4mSL
 WN+g7GWeF/sl+ao4E2YK6UWgifd0B8BuHIJMGLMB9zKEMN3afGaHbMPovYwTwjrWghvp
 w5DGuCuvUc6j+eXshQ5mKQvTvk3FsIWPOiwxZi1puK029WTj667JBM94ueEPLNPbnJIr
 /C/vxg7b/QYzHDbqRx1wG3VgpU56rExECL11YxXa2nZvnbL+QUU5dpFE2kc6Djg/1mfd
 0QGRQfILsAIrGwqJ+0rPI6zI8xul5Odkk+47aKulGVZ+l9ocESKfTxFJ4Funlm00Wo5+
 gvVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530anyZ1xUsp8wVKiXO5XusLKcJoPDe1tLexyZ4UZGpw5TOuraSt
 0BY9A247jgMN9WK00RUWtjvgcOOnN4eLgP8froztPQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJww4A4xTL7lV91CffRmzAWLn2SxaiYqp0npGugQr6HD3TFdQENn1zfA3gUY57XpOjhc/BDtyLaHJUbADoRUs2E=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5e6c:: with SMTP id a12mr12084300lfr.35.1593522098666; 
 Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAuqQpREy5uuL_SKKvGGgR73A-0RTN+RD7xjg5YEy-yniuwMTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <2250034.MpDbe8kn2E@thomas>
In-Reply-To: <2250034.MpDbe8kn2E@thomas>
From: David Liu <dliu@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:01:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAuqQpT4jnWo+P3JA2iePK_fmU=S_0-OtSUnOVAwJXdiHHFKBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dts@dpdk.org,
 Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>, 
 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, 
 Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>, Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>, 
 Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>, Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, 
 Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RSS Key Update Feature
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Thank you for the clarification.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:48 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> 29/06/2020 23:07, David Liu:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I will be implementing a test in DTS for RSS Key Update.
> > http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/features.html#rss-key-update
> >
> > To my understanding, this feature will test the ability to configure the
> > hash key of the ports. If that is incorrect, please let me know.
> >
> > Configure the port RSS hash key in testpmd and check if the new key will
> be
> > kept. Test configure the hash key that is longer than the max length and
> > shorter than the max length.
> >
> > Then start sending in packets with different source and destination IP
> > addresses. Ensure the ports are still able to calculate the hash value
> from
> > the incoming packets.
>
> Updating the key should change the destination queue of the packets.
> By setting up multi-queue Rx and choosing IP addresses accordingly,
> you can see packets arriving on the expected queue.
>
> > Please let me know if there is anything else need to be tested,
>
> A related test could be to read the computed hash in the mbuf metadata.
>
>
>