From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nidhiavarghese93@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E791F5;
 Fri, 19 May 2017 07:23:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 70so68373156wmq.1;
 Thu, 18 May 2017 22:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=08NNXU9AGsfjMD97FOnbb660aBcimJ7Z/bDc4YHuzHA=;
 b=qo+VqPdBZ6me6w/kUC6MARqzFvFOTV3lIxJtJI8rGIFWLqMIeqSbLFg/xKOHdTXd8o
 XWGrHCfWZTFZeZkSlnD2pJmKm+gvKDRVwqAnsQUH93oxA3lgucAZgaefsBNrnIdoxwwF
 ZWR547+dOZ38lXa3sS+a0ZOkqG/hDkHuhbd9+mhZcNs7B+2WtvUgFeJlT8sDZlYEui8e
 Sotc2LhkkxWNeewgtscFiG66PHSLcm8A6pRpeuTjStRniBQSN7p6ym/Z37tv21Evgx8o
 AGU04jVASsRvA0Ub4P9brLdUJO9zeH7Ne0IuZwkKsyR1NFX5iFFinTTwo9OcHB2dyxo1
 nTCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=08NNXU9AGsfjMD97FOnbb660aBcimJ7Z/bDc4YHuzHA=;
 b=rJt1PpZOrtPDRE7bzlDigmQnAPWqP18srniiyS2dYy1OlgRQVA+bKAvtFaX71lVTxB
 Mzj+twLs93h8OUHCNxGxBjqoIZrNcIhS3JEq4xPDcM09G3qroJrXANTLwTYyitC4oXqV
 DrETT7edo4qTzIT6lltS1QU/mYUV4QK+1b9X9dXetDnREIGUya6u9IcZHdJHNVk9bphW
 NgByfo5v8A/LFbluJrOw5EhbOmGHR/SFPa4zbTt0Tp0Te5Ka/oZ8ke3JIg9m0xWC68LL
 ErK05TYV0yjlx/gZqpjMuppiMxIe5So9tRSAB7ef6tsyq7IuZH2/Zy3RDuN3Ik095Rzf
 ucUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDkCmFft0GoGsfO4wwcd5UT0GrWYmFcGzJczBsdpkENi1NCBhpm
 wr9G2bjZz+Q8tDw40HMN+XMsHCIpJg==
X-Received: by 10.28.145.138 with SMTP id t132mr15402511wmd.136.1495171387861; 
 Thu, 18 May 2017 22:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.130.42 with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2017 22:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGSp03mc4JSykrE1iL5GJ_vPxBg+qdACormoP6_nuOhzxu3UWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAx9ALWd3sdtSUvtd8gdeL9d==0X2Bz=XPhD3b-pAjhckoz4VA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGSp03mc4JSykrE1iL5GJ_vPxBg+qdACormoP6_nuOhzxu3UWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nidhia Varghese <nidhiavarghese93@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 10:53:07 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAx9ALVxRHAA3RvG21LmYCnJk_S8j9PvbrdHZ5W8z9TBZCbNZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shyam Shrivastav <shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Defining multiple actions based on a field value for
 the same table lookup in ip_pipeline application
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 05:23:08 -0000

Thanks for your reply Shyam.
Yes, I went through it. But my doubt is whether it is possible to define
two different miss actions based on some decision criteria(input port in my
case).
Miss ->Case 1: Add entry to table if portid = 1
        ->Case 2: Drop if portid = 2

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Shyam Shrivastav <
shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com> wrote:

> For each table a lookup hit and miss function can be registered, have a
> look at
> rte_pipeline_run(struct rte_pipeline *p) for the semantics
>

Thanks,
Nidhia Varghese