From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com (mail-pf0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDB4376C for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:04:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by pff63 with SMTP id 63so12452364pff.2 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:04:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3RMuWKPjjw+jEk0pM/QIfOh3fQeZ93RtSrmd9Wm8TX8=; b=EtVJVTyMpVXxETO2Boa3cODFX0+agurJjupCshujrqbCX3SVC7WqgPHbtAn8+kjkXz r0Zo0tEeh+/o0uIKO8srNVkJuuqy6qN9ctb8JQq2YTYKR9R/GHWhUHXTDCPxgf7Q6Qmy cEf+ezkKua5Jc5Ip8W1nIzTdKv//VM4AL0j2yrad9SX8D6YKsKNQucddRz9U0LIAiwEq 8HgJTxaQSwEz4fWx1EDatkiKXQpLi4wfTxr2mb9R3o7AzmxenJaLa0SfDiVXXGtSVSd3 QeGUgGHqt4FfP+BWrneiRZ29Jfj6O5yZI1WS3CNcASIYoCKGa7eKlHTV9HCPuaClvhUZ PO3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3RMuWKPjjw+jEk0pM/QIfOh3fQeZ93RtSrmd9Wm8TX8=; b=ZT/uKmcwLxHmOrf0QJI57PhTq/A4DVXX8Jm63300gQtZZNNSEfhZ5IizYyxT8ZUZpT BuRYuhdP90WzYbjntPdKfcbvO8RM91hMJGXorZ7dX8JtaewkctpIgF1LWitMldPcWtmQ CGb9KkppUkfH3jvIH6TV9OtzOctxOCu147YHMYZK/6qX1TMiguF2nrs3ItRDNAowo4m+ y2v/mNzvnrIpVNwZjzdetW8c1OHAW5MKfVTYoFpBSuNXe8hwMZ4HDWz4wHgOToCNcGq8 ATsnowSLA3niPpExpDov/W6bpTMuwqrTtHNeYXV8gkdMMbQ9oq1uAZ9Tey8JCxqEScAG cqbw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnqINAjbdh9jNM0/zOgISBkuwxrevw54kOlfGkpApwuHkLAlvdwaLstSIU8I7PkEwZkvFOWMOR0yQm6f6j/qs/oGFnSJpIf2akCvS6ODB8Q8itmaWg= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.98.19.136 with SMTP id 8mr10490631pft.93.1450105467628; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:04:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.13.233 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:04:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151214153421.162c15d0@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <1450098032-21198-8-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <20151214153421.162c15d0@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:34:27 +0530 Message-ID: From: Santosh Shukla To: Jan Viktorin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init() X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:04:28 -0000 On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > I believe, I've already acked this patch. I can see no change here so I > assume it's still the same. > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:30:26 +0530 > Santosh Shukla wrote: > > > iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla > Acked-by: Jan Viktorin > Sorry that I missed in v2 patch! Gonna add in next revision. Thanks