From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FD845BC6; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:14:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3146C4350B; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:14:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-yw1-f170.google.com (mail-yw1-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA3F434F5 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:14:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yw1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6e314136467so11938667b3.0 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:14:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1729790052; x=1730394852; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4Jme5K9TWRAUKLhDTFvWgP+rc0v0WKa/hJvgD12ITkI=; b=QWbu3HiT9f9Nc9UJ7W6rETGay8YRn/Q0OpCAhYaKLB16pwMrRjIYGcEB774sSMs+bf E3XnDPbyd1QXakAzlH0BLsjeFzaqfIg06KC29PvjIZHMDIt2yLWu9CMaWx3y6pULiMt5 s2QsOe6OnvVEXdbcKzYF0ozJLI847HSa6/p/c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729790052; x=1730394852; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4Jme5K9TWRAUKLhDTFvWgP+rc0v0WKa/hJvgD12ITkI=; b=L/4XyzH+GgdkK6shlYod9UNZXcG1hTYMEdJl8r1QjRWY+8MkI0APwbSOoJUp1FP3c/ MlSxk9Wb8Dh1zZ1R2eqNTqLRejU1LW6NQ/ExgjoNd09Ch3t7a6wtQJqt4FNN2xrYMud/ gBzQwtenz0UuZSFpvIwNl12SiLtMvvInhgMYycvdIUNGUbcxs8n0+Cum7w5kWb4531VN jDt10Ff+sALZN3X1wbZnB+rD3IhKuTXhf4RmBioF1WKhqR9vitGfYPyf0dTEfWOsm2pS Tc5P4uEHS2+j69Wqo/8X3mll0ZqgI6oxCeTGG3yoefYNKGZJbpMpxmi0Grsuxiiw0/SJ 6nzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw5FIzk49UtvUXVEbf9wFj85JpDADbdzKvdEeQbEiHTxtpTR9Wq HOi0GC8tDP1J+EttTXpxJVDo2g7b+2FsqlA3QMpqRRRCFlQjeb/ha3kqaarMKeAT/3r7QROlBjQ H6sYdZMPdW6N1a0wWYR24MC5LdxnBQ5ubPj7TlQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHDOAR1z/eUBlNPYFfnLlF+E5euS+a2pYysFfXVfkXchsLEXiKBKzhz7O0VbzrSg3x9YbukgJxqKEnAXW5hBvk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:9b0e:b0:6e5:b054:2385 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6e857fe3930mr24208577b3.14.1729790052252; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:14:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240930160204.19582-1-tomas.durovec@pantheon.tech> <20241021134935.1210500-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dean Marx Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:14:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] DTS external DPDK build To: Luca Vizzarro Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Paul Szczepanek , Patrick Robb Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000099daa806253c21b3" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000099daa806253c21b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ah okay, that makes sense. Yes I'll review that ASAP On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:56=E2=80=AFAM Luca Vizzarro wrote: > On 21/10/2024 23:39, Dean Marx wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > > > I noticed in the new version of this series the "improve statistics" > > patch was taken out, was there any reason for this? I believe Juraj > > wanted to create a feature that wrote all of the test suite/case > > summaries in a JSON/text output file, is this going to be implemented > > later or in a different format? > > Hi Dean, > > Sorry for causing confusion! Like Paul mentioned, this was split in a > different patchset by Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 himself in the non-RFC patchset. I = haven't > had a chance to give it a good look. Once I download it, rebase, solve > merge conflicts and apply any changes (review) needed, I'll send it out. > > In the meantime do you mind providing a review to the patch that Paul > linked, so that I could also apply your comments if you have any. > > Thanks, > Luca > --00000000000099daa806253c21b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ah okay, that makes sense. Yes I'll review that ASAP

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:56=E2=80=AFAM Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> wrote:
On 21/10/2024 23:39, Dean M= arx wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> I noticed in the new version of this series the "improve statisti= cs"
> patch was taken out, was there any reason for this? I believe Juraj > wanted to create a feature that wrote all of the test suite/case
> summaries in a JSON/text output file, is this going to be implemented =
> later or in a different=C2=A0format?

Hi Dean,

Sorry for causing confusion! Like Paul mentioned, this was split in a
different patchset by Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 himself in the non-RFC patchset. I ha= ven't
had a chance to give it a good look. Once I download it, rebase, solve
merge conflicts and apply any changes (review) needed, I'll send it out= .

In the meantime do you mind providing a review to the patch that Paul
linked, so that I could also apply your comments if you have any.

Thanks,
Luca
--00000000000099daa806253c21b3--