From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19A23B5 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 19:46:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igrv9 with SMTP id v9so79502813igr.1 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:46:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9G99k59hufn8AbEDjIiC1NlqobSrP4FLraTlso8Y+Dg=; b=twTQfeoiHv/If36x+jqTzGDTWBlQoTRYp2o3mAe01crWAJvfb4NJ+cSA0NxdIVqZcv oedWB2F1v6We/8sxWUZXCQsSr5FWv+PCPLHGqsKvDFknLBCrr0hImMQzERbZb5xX4+Ga X1xFbayBwaajt9gMD5R5dqCKZggbdAlJ7TeKmnWjMmjjJU65KMv918Je7XV2Lsq2heIH oo4/hRt24kQuNbwGCgnvMXsYbfj8MR0sGn0gJx0Sdi1MtLvy3/31HzeuDASOwAeurTcn WwNyDjMLeOkDZNp3s0Ag6iKOrpzlmXxiQ3E2aXolt6OhZUT3Ia5gME8Y/Guaho8JZzGE rnsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.204.4 with SMTP id fk4mr5555325icb.72.1435772812408; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.194.129 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:46:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gopakumar Choorakkot Edakkunni To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Using rte_ring_mp_xyz() across EAL and non-EAL threads ? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 17:46:53 -0000 Hi, I have a requirement where one of my non-EAL app threads needs to handoff some packets to an EAL task. I was thinking of using rte_ring_mp_enqueue/dequeue for that purpose. I looked at the code for the rte_ring library and it doesnt look like it has any "EAL" dependencies, but I wanted to double confirm that there are no issues in using it that way. Dint find much yes/no info about that on the mailers/docs. Pls let me know your thoughts. Rgds, Gopa.