From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1098146B3E; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 22:11:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A91B402F0; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 22:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-yw1-f175.google.com (mail-yw1-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3FC4028C for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 22:11:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yw1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-716ee8947cdso15672587b3.0 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:11:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1752178313; x=1752783113; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=sLNRlt5JC4mnWCZTGquu6jfh4BC/OB0ihr+z2o3y+cQ=; b=J1rakTmGmGrEVjowTQTtKKFjKXewjQGxV2ZAOKM69hx/F3jcxOJPHWvBK/yDBpGm21 jQ+4nlxbuU/6amhvdGzRdku0QmB80kWTPBPLd8Ow9xx4NQmI8ojAkCvQXoL8GqFjDdjl LdwQwOR9woMoBC2ia/v7XS/XakAsR/mfmtFrU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752178313; x=1752783113; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sLNRlt5JC4mnWCZTGquu6jfh4BC/OB0ihr+z2o3y+cQ=; b=oi3iaZhe29d/0FTAYqc1f4H0wkBeETuRS/nFqjJWMfY4Vx7KHigIGkk1hJ3Elppxsg yBL3VUGYnjepH6tbjk6rBZLzPJd4JnpVAAuOsucoudtO1SLeazuHD7XcqjquTXqSZyPV Vh5aUMi7fL+XB1LpJY7y9pquUK9EZoMDgWxaC5bqVoqOZwaRcp2fXJ4AEe+uPfcwGrKI cKLexN7PSDR38TdNGp5enJ42ixGiDNmlHciz/Y65O5PZJQIpD/Rhufht/YtCRPzb13y2 r6+Udx0NlwvpNDPDnMsDzgQmV2L7GotBa7FnPFemolo1wf0FwQbTRAYALi0qZqQYxmKS qenw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVRmhe+zJ5WUhScbXtfzJi4RvV5gLWAPvPvNmjuF/3smX7VUbu3B9Uytf0Vk5qbWMOlv2k=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzpxfNdgRDO6A0BQ4Ye04KOtl55cB3xy9g8ojot1s49YSd+jHNf ZYBniGqSmNZ/I9yepYaUM4qkSu9ZMxudVRQuT4AHzrI/3s3ImdiOIQBMfJ6DLfkSp5AWH2AX1/B 1MTnOl8BNLzoTZtHQjG9DouqN0Tv0cE8vVx0JZJKc5A== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu/7iuJ7Mai1zpvL1GN1cKjp7GfpCD0Mbubh3eaGsjdak1uPFzSj7aN5lgHdSv qCwB45k12FqQIC+HN0RLI+vLO5ZD13QMZPmRY/9UT97b6mVB9+6MWwCRwlbJS1EiEzGhvaEJ2t3 Hm541/rusO8O7KKKrlFVE+U+2DCpola3U50HFarSzNFsNXdwPrqrwqalDYNIcN3a1vMg20DMdFY YVx1ixWsVfuhrBrlskswmg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFtXxE0LHojY8NI4cL6JMni8oNtAdYTKBGl8cOsjWwN56xXTDOQyXJ9znFcTlEk1BB0bxGhZYzDRCZ5pGIj+z4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:f96:b0:716:59a6:2dc5 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-717d5bc92damr18039567b3.15.1752178312771; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:11:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Adam Hassick Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:11:41 -0400 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXx9nszQfJ9NQTGmyj8OZwixr7lB2Xb-7Jxt_7wp6vO_CRJAv2Dy89GhS4o Message-ID: Subject: Re: Polling for patchseries in DPDK - the /series/ and /events/ endpoints To: Patrick Robb Cc: ci@dpdk.org, dev , Ali Alnubani , "Brandes, Shai" , zhoumin , "Puttaswamy, Rajesh T" , Aaron Conole Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi All, It appears that there already is a filter for projects for events, but the filter is configured to be hidden from the HTML view for some reason. We don't need to make any code changes to enable this feature. See here: https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/blob/stable/3.2/patchwo= rk/api/filters.py#L239 If you visit the following URL: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/events/?category=3Dseries-created&project=3D= CI You can filter for series created events by project. This query filters for series created events for the CI repo's project. Adam On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:07=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb w= rote: > > I went looking through recent series on patchwork and I think this is a g= ood example of the timestamp condition: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/seri= es/35145/. Looks like the original commits were made on April 18, then the = newest version was submitted on May 5 but the series record retains the 4/1= 8 date. > > And I see that there is no project filter provided by the /events/ endpoi= nt. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/events/ > > Adam, would you agree the project filter for API requests is pretty low h= anging fruit? Seems like a common sense improvement to me. > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:08=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb w= rote: >> >> Thanks for the clarification regarding the datetimes. Yes let's clear up= any remaining questions offline at Prague. :)