DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Harte <seanbh@gmail.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	 anatoly.burakov@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio-user: fix deadlock in memory events callback
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:10:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACA5i9Z7DTwtmNGg6Qs50pZ3JwyQUsbtz1KJKiDiKOhOCJfwog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905042852.6212-2-tiwei.bie@intel.com>

On 5 September 2018 at 05:28, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com> wrote:
> Deadlock can occur when allocating memory if a vhost-kernel
> based virtio-user device is in use. To fix the deadlock,
> we will take memory hotplug lock explicitly in virtio-user
> when necessary, and always call the _thread_unsafe memory
> functions.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 81
> Fixes: 12ecb2f63b12 ("net/virtio-user: support memory hotplug")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Reported-by: Seán Harte <seanbh@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c |  6 +++++-
>  .../net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c  | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
> index b2444096c..897fee0af 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,11 @@ prepare_vhost_memory_kernel(void)
>         wa.region_nr = 0;
>         wa.vm = vm;
>
> -       if (rte_memseg_contig_walk(add_memory_region, &wa) < 0) {
> +       /*
> +        * The memory lock has already been taken by memory subsystem
> +        * or virtio_user_start_device().
> +        */
> +       if (rte_memseg_contig_walk_thread_unsafe(add_memory_region, &wa) < 0) {
>                 free(vm);
>                 return NULL;
>         }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> index 7df600b02..869e96f87 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <sys/stat.h>
>
> +#include <rte_eal_memconfig.h>
> +
>  #include "vhost.h"
>  #include "virtio_user_dev.h"
>  #include "../virtio_ethdev.h"
> @@ -109,9 +111,24 @@ is_vhost_user_by_type(const char *path)
>  int
>  virtio_user_start_device(struct virtio_user_dev *dev)
>  {
> +       struct rte_mem_config *mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
>         uint64_t features;
>         int ret;
>
> +       /*
> +        * XXX workaround!
> +        *
> +        * We need to make sure that the locks will be
> +        * taken in the correct order to avoid deadlocks.
> +        *
> +        * Before releasing this lock, this thread should
> +        * not trigger any memory hotplug events.
> +        *
> +        * This is a temporary workaround, and should be
> +        * replaced when we get proper supports from the
> +        * memory subsystem in the future.
> +        */
> +       rte_rwlock_read_lock(&mcfg->memory_hotplug_lock);
>         pthread_mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>
>         if (is_vhost_user_by_type(dev->path) && dev->vhostfd < 0)
> @@ -152,10 +169,12 @@ virtio_user_start_device(struct virtio_user_dev *dev)
>
>         dev->started = true;
>         pthread_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
> +       rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&mcfg->memory_hotplug_lock);
>
>         return 0;
>  error:
>         pthread_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
> +       rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&mcfg->memory_hotplug_lock);
>         /* TODO: free resource here or caller to check */
>         return -1;
>  }
> --
> 2.18.0
>

Tested-by: Seán Harte <seanbh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Seán Harte <seanbh@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-05  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-05  4:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Some fixes/improvements for virtio-user memory table Tiwei Bie
2018-09-05  4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio-user: fix deadlock in memory events callback Tiwei Bie
2018-09-05  8:10   ` Sean Harte [this message]
2018-09-07  9:30   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-11 12:52   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-05  4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/virtio-user: avoid parsing process mappings Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07  9:39   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-07 11:35     ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07 12:21       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-10  3:59         ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-17 10:17           ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-17 11:57             ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-17 13:06               ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-11 12:58   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-05  4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio-user: fix memory hotplug support in vhost-kernel Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07  9:44   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-07 11:37     ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07 12:24       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-10  4:04         ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-17 10:18           ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-11 13:10   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-11 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Some fixes/improvements for virtio-user memory table Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-20  7:35 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACA5i9Z7DTwtmNGg6Qs50pZ3JwyQUsbtz1KJKiDiKOhOCJfwog@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=seanbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).