From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E42A034C; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 19:00:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD46E41143; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 19:00:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEE74113D; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 19:00:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id z2so2454754plg.8; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:00:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CDPJaXiiTVriwIuApoGubvD8hqKslE/WtCkEw5Zx7Qg=; b=mIBVnalmaTwbx6eXIJWz9pnMXBIdkpQRD/flkbmsaJ1ePW14pKoy80pKaXCazapdkf j5lqSjDKErtvAm/Xjl+9L50Dx6TXTAA9govnA/MyTHs72mqapc4j26g8JFPAYwNs4c33 TCAmmUECL/PoOK/iTtF9vF3yzaN18i272pcwGvlTEydOgneqO06pULf6hNoMEGlbXBhc x2WlXVWAzt3A0SpPDRNKWuzSu6i4R2/5wmqQ1hYRf5RQBYy2/2MERlaTAJo6Sb6NfEj9 xR5pQQve0HrYUTC/LuVMFuIgu99INbKE8XVRLyVpBuIH589hbyTApyOrpqlUVhYmr3tX kw+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CDPJaXiiTVriwIuApoGubvD8hqKslE/WtCkEw5Zx7Qg=; b=aMJvBxIhy54Db3LzGy2jaAsYFW8gshwPML6FrY3Vrq1HZp067vGOGBc3jfXTyzXuGv ZmDFZ4arceQLgI4DJVPFBjX1QxpW64OKYQWi/wiDfTs99E1onwpGmR+oxUfGJ661n0yY /Qkl/2Fu7anhQhU1vrDiLL5y2qXkNGTOUJ+4S8WhxFnLZ9TjPmX46BHkfqxU6QE2prLw 3SaT2XKtZTA6HCZlkfcAqYd3YkdC8lz1DHSUZ5BT/fExVVOU6XTcUeuQSAJZC0N3cw69 o2vVV4jwCM/STlv1IbSdbHiJCwletCnvCcVlCh7vVtfhyn8RD1JJxTzDUB5D6VFRCH/c xtgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531W5dNU2E697JopGGgvWyXBY83klvwQYddeeAsRedmL1bGJ+UgY iwKtejZM1vjQOSjh/6gyLeyk9kJ1DwQNAiu0TX7Z/DAh9eM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRudPSjLq5rVIgTY9dM4TDegkQKgMOYipgCTMx4nMbggHb0Qpp2hU2hM8w2Z56MRxkyKZVRu0oWO7e3JWsfbo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9008:b0:14f:b1f9:5271 with SMTP id a8-20020a170902900800b0014fb1f95271mr3644760plp.86.1645725632828; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:00:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211025054029.1140977-1-dapengx.yu@intel.com> <20211026015542.1416819-1-dapengx.yu@intel.com> <32fc5d6c6b6c40aaa04320307672c878@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <32fc5d6c6b6c40aaa04320307672c878@intel.com> From: Navin Srinivas Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 23:30:06 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix function pointer in multi-process To: "Zhang, Qi Z" Cc: "Yu, DapengX" , "Yang, Qiming" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Wang, Haiyue" , "stable@dpdk.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be173905d8c75baf" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000be173905d8c75baf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, Whether this fix is applicable for VF? I do not see this change ported to VF in DPDK-20.11.4. Thanks, Navin Srinivas On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 8:58 AM Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Yu, DapengX > > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:56 AM > > To: Yang, Qiming ; Zhang, Qi Z > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wang, Haiyue ; Yu, DapengX > > ; stable@dpdk.org > > Subject: [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix function pointer in multi-process > > > > From: Dapeng Yu > > > > This patch uses the index value to call the function, instead of the > function > > pointer assignment to save the selection of Receive Flex Descriptor > profile ID. > > > > Otherwise the secondary process will run with wrong function address from > > primary process. > > > > Fixes: 7a340b0b4e03 ("net/ice: refactor Rx FlexiMD handling") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Dapeng Yu > > Acked-by: Haiyue Wang > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. > > Thanks > Qi > --000000000000be173905d8c75baf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

Whether this fix i= s applicable for VF? I do not see this change ported to VF in DPDK-20.11.4.= =C2=A0

Thanks,
Navin Srinivas

On We= d, Oct 27, 2021 at 8:58 AM Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yu, DapengX <dapengx.yu@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:56 AM
> To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zha= ng@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org= ; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; Yu, DapengX
> <dapengx.= yu@intel.com>; = stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix function pointer in multi-process
>
> From: Dapeng Yu <dapengx.yu@intel.com>
>
> This patch uses the index value to call the function, instead of the f= unction
> pointer assignment to save the selection of Receive Flex Descriptor pr= ofile ID.
>
> Otherwise the secondary process will run with wrong function address f= rom
> primary process.
>
> Fixes: 7a340b0b4e03 ("net/ice: refactor Rx FlexiMD handling"= )
> Cc: stable@dpdk.o= rg
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Yu <dapengx.yu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks
Qi
--000000000000be173905d8c75baf--