Re: [PATCH] Spelling

[Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>]

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:02 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 29/11/2021 14:59, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:49:56PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > On 11/26/2021 7:58 PM, Josh Soref wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
> > > > index ff7813f9..603e7c91 100644
> > > > --- a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
> > > > +++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
> > > > @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ void
> > > >   order_opt_dump(struct evt_options *opt)
> > > >   {
> > > >           evt_dump_producer_lcores(opt);
> > > > - evt_dump("nb_wrker_lcores", "%d", evt_nr_active_lcores(opt->wlcores));
> > > > + evt_dump("nb_worker_lcores", "%d", evt_nr_active_lcores(opt->wlcores));
> > >
> > > Hi Josh, Thanks for the patch.
> > >
> > > The typo fixes for comments and logs are more straightforward, but I have
> > > mixed feeling about the variable / macro typo fixes, let's see what others
> > > think.
> > >
> > > And I think we should get this patch either one of the first patch or last
> > > patch to prevent conflict with other patches.
> >
> > +1 to being a first patch to start things off clean.
> >
> > For the macros, since there is quick a bit of content in the patch, could
> > we have the patch split into a separate patch for macro changes to review
> > separately, allowing the simple doc/printf spelling changes to go in
> > immediately?
>
> +1 to start with a patch on doc, comments and log messages
+1

>
>