From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB28A0546; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:16:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CC2140FA1; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:16:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f178.google.com (mail-qt1-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6EF407FF for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:16:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f178.google.com with SMTP id y2so12773461qtw.13 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 20:16:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4Mq3JWHtSkQ33Z7K5cw4NeFQDTXk2mWGlO97cLnkf0U=; b=HCTN3mkRaWiIHvt6uNtqDwJu6etevXxngVz2Uhc7LJDHUXduryGZVS6dGuyWEEfOwm Gclq7pTQdv5QXrr8wOsimfJFSg4L9BoGyG6ZsFPBBp9aemyZw6j0le4Bz523P08qb5iV hRKqY4kApcxO6Pw2kF/AGIw34AG5VKtzZ3cgA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4Mq3JWHtSkQ33Z7K5cw4NeFQDTXk2mWGlO97cLnkf0U=; b=ZwMzZapLNF4Ospi/EcxpeAJRGdmTwF2AzOPBDW7mVInv+hycI7pDfWS2kxgeLvs4zU kTvQ6CU4iVeOqN/P/DXHzIlbjgUT41zM9HLY8l9a9GRH5JhE1xwAZlw6bRjXWVvhK7t2 S6dJnk7M4XEYXxGPLrVL2NsCpiowG9Jxd3Q50QUqNYa4RjXl44PlCHOHz68B2x3HlkA4 uL2GBzXY7u8oCj6734Drua8psfBdlkFnjyJg9GxT07AKk+4gN7qg1Mszqs71U7ptiZ4h aoxvgvo8oRO2n2DuZCgD6zGbGBfAe7qK/K2Uc78IDXhkzQJRX82X53Tpa90nz8lgQfHC 63AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WBHdWRB4OUwQk3jQdEN/pb6re8J/egnGoKnRVFBYdWOVPqMG5 wIq+B9XJl4AfILA7zYDKI1hJZUxdOjZ1rnLv3o1wJg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuTmy+yAa1kpO5L5icMhKf4EfpidTTBZlymh+UWOloJ1J5jwNwgWipDfiNLAz+nFXR9ZxDU6VgjQ8xVjuG9CY= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5047:: with SMTP id h7mr1049429qtm.22.1617765404957; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 20:16:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1615967952-228321-1-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com> <27c5c98f-b29c-d8a6-d3f3-05fcd41d5a8a@oktetlabs.ru> <3094400.VKgfFvgXnU@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3094400.VKgfFvgXnU@thomas> From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 20:16:29 -0700 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Bing Zhao , Andrew Rybchenko , Ori Kam , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="00000000000050390d05bf595c53" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce action context APIs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" --00000000000050390d05bf595c53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:48 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 06/04/2021 11:07, Bing Zhao: > > Hi Thomas and Andrew, > > > > From: Andrew Rybchenko > > > On 3/17/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 17/03/2021 08:59, Bing Zhao: > > > >> The new functions rte_flow_action_ctx* that were added will > > > replace > > > >> the curret shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_create > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_destroy > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_update > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_query > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_create > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_destroy > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_update > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_query > > > >> > > > >> When creating a action context, it could be shared among > > > different > > > >> flows or different ports. Or it could also be used by a single > > > flow. > > > >> The name "shared" is improper in a sense. > > > > > > > > Is it the only reason for the change? > > > > I better understand "shared" even if it is sometimes not shared. > > > > > > +1 > > > > In another email, I explained the change a bit more. Please check and give comments, thank you all. > > Any link to this email from inbox.dpdk.org? I don't see the RFC/patch even on patchwork or inbox. Can you send a link to the mail/patch which initiated the discussion? > > Please explain here the naming reason. > > --00000000000050390d05bf595c53--