From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4AFA0547; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 16:46:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAF240041; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 16:46:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4014003C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 16:46:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id b188so8430710iof.8 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 07:46:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+blkDR8RPm9s3DnaBdrEGEFBj/+VZ3lmySOJa35rYQA=; b=BNoO0OORGjFC74RkL3hsa55wtLMB+mAWSAVlJan9kf4p5KX4emOALTAH/OcUyPUPfl WQss63LrBL1cVRBZm29KkGvevHGFmdwBAUogBUHQsi0nMQ51pdSKLXRCCnl0xpMJ2+Qe Sl/BMccXGpaQhUsych2HNG0H0oYnNzq2kTtQI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+blkDR8RPm9s3DnaBdrEGEFBj/+VZ3lmySOJa35rYQA=; b=AK0sENpQ1hUdVNULPhDh3jc08bLI6/hGo3h3sam1CTye/Ng71wiCqlTn/STn6SXKP2 WqgHe3u7IXerf+sLGZ55ocIMrWdsWNzMvUonTQ30Vp7QnAwtmI/x5LoeKt8Sn2ciECO3 hQCrCt8aFHoJlnJn/jj6IvtViKwZ0r+0GIs0JAIYVBsxJF9+1TaMSZtKpHo54AI4ntAA nDcPPpRiZN0lW2KllDyCb4xXKO0lZsBhLI4hkvg8sq+YlEMHm89eR0pWB3YDbegPtUrw wJUBn3RgBi+QGctos0XrgBFiRY/BPjFbM1h+OHuocXkQA43razpoKjXDMIXczZqTZIav cWiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oZPlsNharMauwgZ3TNfpmBp+MZ9ZoRwCBTgZvx/QZl/B7a7ua 2QNnQbjwt/8J/Y0IkvmGjE6/nDVyr8G+GaSGPAqiSg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiWsFhXEDlpKOFaFWNIHeOsFW4xy7Dk8ljZKvj3qfh5Z/NtqOnjiwQ3kk6ILYApvojkPi9tI5g5HXKMoAdjj4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2d81:: with SMTP id k1mr10875635iow.87.1634481971027; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 07:46:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210929214817.18082-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20211015192408.21798-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20211015192408.21798-5-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <441caa54-4870-3d3f-773d-28c391b1c32b@oktetlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <441caa54-4870-3d3f-773d-28c391b1c32b@oktetlabs.ru> From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 07:45:55 -0700 Message-ID: To: Andrew Rybchenko Cc: Olivier Matz , dpdk-dev , David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] mbuf: add rte prefix to offload flags X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 12:57 AM Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > On 10/15/21 10:24 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > > Fix the mbuf offload flags namespace by adding an RTE_ prefix to the > > name. The old flags remain usable, but a deprecation warning is issued > > at compilation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > > Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde >