On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:30 PM Ajit Khaparde
<ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:07 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >
> > 28/06/2023 18:35, Ajit Khaparde:
> > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 11:33 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > > > More important, you are doing huge update of many different things
> > > > in one patch.
> > > > It looks like you don't want the community to follow what you are doing.
> > > Actually, no.
> > > As I mentioned above, most of the truflow files are auto generated.
> > > The reason for bundling some of the changes together was to avoid
> > > multiple patches hitting the mail server patch size limit.
> > > We thought it might be better to take the patch size hit on one patch
> > > instead of multiple patches.
> >
> > I don't see how it is better to have one huge patch
> > than multiple big ones.
> Well, its debatable now, considering we are having this discussion.
> But as I said, the current design of the truflow generator scripts tend to make
> a lot of changes even for a small modification or adjustment to the code.
> We had patches which were moving around the same lines of code because
> of the script. That's why we decided to take this approach.
> We could try to split the patch with the template changes, but that may take
> time and we are closing in on rc3 date.

Patches applied to dpdk-next-net-brcm. Thanks


>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > We are working on some design changes to the auto generation scripts
> > > which will avoid big churn in the template patches in the future.
> >
> >
> >