From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B1AA10DA for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:32:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54A61C06B; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:32:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com (mail-oi1-f195.google.com [209.85.167.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEFB1BEE2 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:32:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id m202so50468159oig.6 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:32:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QY1TZI+wn4UyKmJOh4HLaVsQhkA3RHOebqhfNyYgiJo=; b=XQJP8XkVhAJdm/2qt7xm45sRio75i/5vFl3E6fbEs/NB5imRI9qq2odPWp/wv7Uok7 2ccRaNES+cMdwCl3D4M/GfviO87vU1eqTbF1kGH9+sYw3V3tv7uFHTTdvGaitmIcU88s 22WzbIq1W9AMhl3dj9rjo9hk+lpIgzgUzGQzo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QY1TZI+wn4UyKmJOh4HLaVsQhkA3RHOebqhfNyYgiJo=; b=Ac4dkdJGsh1GvJWQ9TxWivW6v2YfQtoKGB1LJUM5BLXFnGvvUvY7jcnsigMX51p408 KWWXVbhWRhYTa8frjlZV/2krrDE5nxlp8iTYJTS2SLhVA7sR/onvloO+iBBtn9qX4J3l LWt+uh2qojOKLgRuqBxM98jW1Hzw5WO3m0TipEteOwfmoO6tbPpawVGxmilD08aWH1NL NaM2MgY9zhRzOjtLO0ZLHM3LHUVl55cEgi0eBh5Qy3fV2tijg32qA9UwzoQfLdiuLCAS i4qOXZq62r3zhWtunQrsLw8ptxLouzoxxoJh+MJSJCXuyQ31vEGHwrDG0wrY3Fp9Rs4Y VKUA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW2yiiMq+Zv/Srgrlb/elTVKAYZZ22vA7mkv/MN+PWskV6fCm9N BOl5Qlwvq7iftowshSDRLFqdXAi5MaZltjxGsucE0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2W+xoLLdHzPSO4Bay+Gwa5arH9Y2ZePfafvQ1uPhnuHMmBx4G6dcTijVFOB+0w6OrAXNF4q8k/vCfWwwOxLU= X-Received: by 2002:aca:6046:: with SMTP id u67mr8532820oib.27.1564572764522; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:32:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190730155948.26631-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <93bd9d93-ab38-52ac-5486-3735142be67e@solarflare.com> In-Reply-To: <93bd9d93-ab38-52ac-5486-3735142be67e@solarflare.com> From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:32:26 -0700 Message-ID: To: Andrew Rybchenko Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Somnath Kotur , Beilei Xing , Qi Zhang , Wenzhuo Lu , Konstantin Ananyev , dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:36 AM Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 7/30/19 6:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Since the concept of representors was introduced, > > we do not need any specific API for VF ports. > > Any VF port should be able to be configured through > > its representor port in a more generic fashion. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko > Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde