On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:53 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 03/09/2021 17:35, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 9/3/2021 12:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 02/09/2021 18:33, Ferruh Yigit: > > >> On 8/26/2021 11:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > >>> +* Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed. > > >>> + > > >>> +rc3 > > >>> +~~~ > > >>> + > > >>> +* Priority: applications. No application feature should be accepted after -rc3. > > >>> +* New functionality that does not depend on libraries update > > >>> + can be integrated as part of -rc3. > > >>> +* The application change must include documentation in the relevant .rst files > > >>> + (application-specific and release notes if significant). > > >>> +* Libraries and drivers cleanup are allowed. > > >>> +* Small driver reworks. > > >>> +* Critical and minor bug fixes. > > >> > > >> As mentioned before, my concern is this may create false impression that bugs > > >> are fixed only in this phase. What about remove this line completely and update > > >> below -rc4 one as 'Critical bug fixes only.'? I think that makes intention more > > >> clear. > > > > > > I had added in -rc2: "Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed." > > > Do you want to remove it as well? > > > > I think we can keep it, good to highlight one of the major tasks for -rc2 is to > > fix defects found in -rc1, and it doesn't limit fixes to ones found in -rc1. > > Actually I think it is better to remove. > It looks weird to have it only in -rc2. I see you have sent the new version and it is looking really good. We can mention that bug fixes are welcome at any point in the cycle, but priority will be given to critical fixes close to the release date. > >