From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD581A0C43; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:11:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906834069C; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:11:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A834068F for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:11:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id j18so17780327ioj.8 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q3/jUwEc5H5RgjKdl5gt0W96uKPtnHzeAbcT9NanfL4=; b=cvbg/7x6YNfJwHK2pfTX99S26GJgRqElBg1+9Iyegw9klRYe12ztKZg+MrLS+m8v4M 0evGVxo4G+5AgBFbD6Gm8UQuuI6tonJgnEPmE83imIZ7ye5J7vO9C+3iVRPO7hHFi/oz R4g1U7Q9vpyD/4Wao4SXzS9nWyKlMYwMga8Xg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q3/jUwEc5H5RgjKdl5gt0W96uKPtnHzeAbcT9NanfL4=; b=r/o/SqMsvHURRgLHFmJKRMFmNfzim2bjmjLNCUJXHnZjFU3JcSHXAH/T3TcPrZ+MMs otNfFSyJ10MP8bnlC61EkDBZZvFoMTxYkITL8gYvs5rAWBcHkEf4ilanTeHKCRQqRzHQ P/pEGG77dg5YcVl0+d24fNSJZYAod0TBGXw7kG3/oJ3VAeB0AVDBeGt8tse1OVqrsToV i0iIV4tTQftfaVf5JNVSjhDjdhqN/fryDFUbbtDkOVmuy02RPyocqZGCWx2lBqdtNfPu A03yWRABfhC6V/qqhaVhv7OiBtUtgBEAcIntYbgdaxYlDqVUPSjjcDwiJFY0ygYrRDIB mEOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qIb5i5AfMBwV6Z/35MuMA1/iXMMcGriyvFZeyTSAEehhoFtPe j6XPlhzx84FaDL02sBHQHG4n1SlPb/qY29rnf2g+9g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAUSwTYOx6M+vk0l9gPs+ssM6ci/+SNSRTyKLvKtk25T7Ek8m+6AucQZxfxzg++QN0uPcW82oVr46rN5CWYS8= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6a13:: with SMTP id x19mr14645225iog.111.1631635896132; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1610304247-11455-1-git-send-email-asafp@nvidia.com> <2766038.zeebYbSGT0@thomas> <6b842212-dc7f-d8cc-ba24-0aa88bca74ea@intel.com> <6502593.BjeyWQVfyn@thomas> In-Reply-To: <6502593.BjeyWQVfyn@thomas> From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:11:20 -0700 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dpdk-dev , David Marchand , Asaf Penso , John McNamara , Bruce Richardson Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="00000000000002989f05cbf6d6e2" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] doc: add release milestones definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" --00000000000002989f05cbf6d6e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:53 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 03/09/2021 17:35, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 9/3/2021 12:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 02/09/2021 18:33, Ferruh Yigit: > > >> On 8/26/2021 11:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > >>> +* Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed. > > >>> + > > >>> +rc3 > > >>> +~~~ > > >>> + > > >>> +* Priority: applications. No application feature should be accepted after -rc3. > > >>> +* New functionality that does not depend on libraries update > > >>> + can be integrated as part of -rc3. > > >>> +* The application change must include documentation in the relevant .rst files > > >>> + (application-specific and release notes if significant). > > >>> +* Libraries and drivers cleanup are allowed. > > >>> +* Small driver reworks. > > >>> +* Critical and minor bug fixes. > > >> > > >> As mentioned before, my concern is this may create false impression that bugs > > >> are fixed only in this phase. What about remove this line completely and update > > >> below -rc4 one as 'Critical bug fixes only.'? I think that makes intention more > > >> clear. > > > > > > I had added in -rc2: "Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed." > > > Do you want to remove it as well? > > > > I think we can keep it, good to highlight one of the major tasks for -rc2 is to > > fix defects found in -rc1, and it doesn't limit fixes to ones found in -rc1. > > Actually I think it is better to remove. > It looks weird to have it only in -rc2. I see you have sent the new version and it is looking really good. We can mention that bug fixes are welcome at any point in the cycle, but priority will be given to critical fixes close to the release date. > > --00000000000002989f05cbf6d6e2--