From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32EDA0C41; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:19:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DF840E25; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:19:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f169.google.com (mail-il1-f169.google.com [209.85.166.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0386E407FF for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:19:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f169.google.com with SMTP id b6so7257145ilv.0 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:19:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vQlwnAE0riAWTVVN9lGZH0+8cD4sSoVeD1b7qTnfM4A=; b=QMtAkOO0Kmp5lanAwMxqcU0aVnXyZ08hB/ZnMof8vvYTIEwO6sMsilfZ2Eeb1N03R4 dci8tHPzqiZpN3ArmQtvqzIsnxqdHhdJ039f1alraJ6j2gWclvgtzD9Q2Y1++MRlhiLG WrX12lmY/WmdrUCWXrVHOW3jOe3xsASnh6RRc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vQlwnAE0riAWTVVN9lGZH0+8cD4sSoVeD1b7qTnfM4A=; b=MbnNIFyMCoDRog0ShZz/eDWCNB9xfCq+Y5EJnzbFdhPVB+O1TTNUcx2KsRAUlyfp41 Q9j0WERXN7IOpFwiKLPKaO6OLV5f29Ed1TozOFpp3h7FwmeDb1EBi64Fpe8BQTXbV2eN Abr1Idyd4zdXIZiGwm17WkCfKeGfJfmoc/qPyBHWy+erk3MifcLWjFIxdqv97an6BzSm zco0W8JimMbbQ5tJg5CSlaAM7nc9DKQBiBKsn87DZBjtCmaJBtsPaJ2xgRcVoFTVUqbj yCuhDvWNC3STo006o2L5FdfqSGEPhMwXNWEy2ZGHm1YGjim9WcVpGJSrayCmVbNa0AHn Yiow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HVb/MGAKkSSHGL65Ykvo1UKlMBVX7M9Ew9v4iZWnMVuntK6MF 3HWPwfOQfyBCCsuuDt8mQSH5bZg2gYkXhx/T1GOWRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeth4DhzNmA9xmt09z6T3f+BwfIBaBLgsfwVeSd7Aua1z6KzExhpuJAwyKwG4Nne5VE3mgYRooaY4/7M0lLsM= X-Received: by 2002:a92:b06:: with SMTP id b6mr4798543ilf.26.1631809148323; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:19:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210908050643.9989-1-venkatkumar.duvvuru@broadcom.com> <20210911153041.28510-1-venkatkumar.duvvuru@broadcom.com> <82d8a833-3b3f-5483-fdff-61e232d93fda@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <82d8a833-3b3f-5483-fdff-61e232d93fda@intel.com> From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:18:52 -0700 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Aaron Conole , dpdklab , Venkat Duvvuru , dpdk-dev , Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand , Ali Alnubani Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="000000000000a4d00405cc1f2c4d" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/13] enhancements to host based flow table management X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" --000000000000a4d00405cc1f2c4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:26 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 9/11/2021 4:30 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > > This patch set adds support for new offload features/enhancments for > > Thor adapters like VF representor support, new flow matches/actions > > & dynamic SRAM manager support. > > > > v2 ==> v3 > > ========= > > * Fixed compilation issue. > > > > Farah Smith (4): > > net/bnxt: tf core index table updates > > net/bnxt: add Thor SRAM mgr model > > net/bnxt: tf core SRAM Manager > > net/bnxt: sram manager shared session > > > > Jay Ding (1): > > net/bnxt: add flow meter drop counter support > > > > Kishore Padmanabha (6): > > net/bnxt: add flow templates support for Thor > > net/bnxt: add support for tunnel offloads > > net/bnxt: add support for dynamic encap action > > net/bnxt: add wild card TCAM byte order for Thor > > net/bnxt: add flow templates for Thor > > net/bnxt: add enhancements to TF ULP > > > > Peter Spreadborough (1): > > net/bnxt: enable dpool allocator > > > > Randy Schacher (1): > > net/bnxt: dynamically allocate space for EM defrag function > > > > Hi Ajit, > > There are a few checkpatch errors reported, can you please check them? I had taken care of them, but I forgot to mention it in my merge mail. So the next spin of the patches should have those addressed. > > Also CI seems failed to apply the patch and not run, indeed patch is merged in > the correct tree, but seems on top of wrong commit [1]. Looks like Brandon has root caused it. Thanks Ajit > > > Aaron, Lab, > > Can you please check if there is an issue with the tree synchronization. (This > is previously reported for eventdev too, perhaps there may be a generic problem.) > > Can you please trigger the testing of this set after repo updated? > > > [1] > dpdk-next-net-brcm (175af25734f295874e31b33ccd0879e69fd152a9) --000000000000a4d00405cc1f2c4d--