From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309F2A0562; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26991C0C9; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com (mail-ot1-f68.google.com [209.85.210.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D5E1C0B2 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 111so22962684oth.13 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NHhO2G5BEOYzYF6HuTjQBNy5G39gcFUM1clVPkbYPJE=; b=ITdCrkB2WR0rUgIip3aGDz2xZW7cZ7T3MthviUahNTNowoDZ4eb0b0wvAzK8pjBCQ0 ssjjAvg5pfxII6ALwYcmeoDd4xLIXcLIhHytQ8xjSfI6tk9FkkEsQ8Ov6M4si5BD+J5i 9OL52gJynlw7gB0njvJO7Gjori73cSVsnwfoQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NHhO2G5BEOYzYF6HuTjQBNy5G39gcFUM1clVPkbYPJE=; b=jIcjXDmE1V4vKHErywFvOd4QrixNs+eoMoobm9qJN37g1BG1/98EYbPtt4W75eq8rK MHFkfFYg1TlVaWO0+Xm6h/EWvCV+1gbTHqKvwuwB+LJQ+9o+IkDAXLcOYanyEv1x8r0T NzpSD0psCt1ZJBfQEpMjmanxotWjhX6hnaY19Gxghwg6MP21/zwoSpvJB9jShtejBA/M YkWnubSvbs4+0j0ntVp3FX9O0FjvXSoA4Jr4bD5a/y2fQoKbToWkc8PL56X3/V7m/1SN t3ji53nHE8dM03Tr1KrhXErEi76X2oUMWTtkbroKmYEZMnRdNKb5RLqdriWq36jsN1I2 mfsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1VTWVV94wKTl5pH3hM6+u4Cq+hcxSDg1VJmQEU20pMg7uAQsrk ftl8qn7tbilsLDzOmcWp3NztFMAN7qs9TJn/Al7cuQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtMOXpjRgOwuuiyvxwWbDMkzTVGof2GaDNU11x6r9n1OTeqm48BlZDyLqboNn3AP87pN3ZJqjKemM6gdJZ2QGo= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7a7:: with SMTP id 36mr9817641oto.283.1585677183534; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:53:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200303175938.14292-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:52:47 -0700 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Somnath Kotur , dpdk-dev , David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] net/bnxt: bounds checking patches X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:23 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 3/3/2020 5:59 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > This set of patches came from security review of bnxt driver. > > It introduces a set of overflow macros that could be more widely > > used in other places in DPDK to check for math overflows. > > > > Stephen Hemminger (6): > > eal: add portable way to check for math overflow > > net/bnxt: fix potential data race > > net/bnxt: avoid potential out of bounds read > > net/bnxt: check for integer overflow in buffer sizing > > net/bnxt: add integer underflow check > > net/bnxt: sanitize max_l2_ctx > > > > Hi Ajit, > > I can see this patchset has been merged into your tree, although the note > in the > mail list is missing. Since it has eal changes, I believe they should be > reviewed first before merging into brcm tree, can you separate the eal and > dependent patch for review, we can proceed with rest? > I don't mind. But being original owner - Stephen, do you want to go ahead? Thanks Ajit > > Regards, > ferruh >