Re: [PATCH v10] examples/ptp: replace terms master and slave

[Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1570 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:39 AM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:41:07 -0700
> Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> > Remove one of the few remaining uses of master/slave.
> >
> > The IEEE 1588 standard has been updated to remove the use
> > of master-slave terminology. Change the sample to Use the terms
> > recommended by IEEE 1588g-2022 amendment.
> >
> >   In place of the term “master”, use the term “timeTransmitter”.
> >   In place of the term “slave”, use the term “timeReceiver”.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
> >
> > ---
> > v10 - rebase to current version
> >
> >  doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst                   |  8 ++--
> >  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/img/ptpclient.svg |  4 +-
> >  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/intro.rst         |  4 +-
> >  doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ptpclient.rst     | 29 ++++++------
> >  examples/ptpclient/ptpclient.c             | 54 +++++++++++-----------
> >  5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> This patch seems to have been lost/ignored. Could it be merged for 24.11.
>
> Note: checkpatch complaints here are incorrect. The patch is removing
> terms master and slave, but checkpatch can't tell the difference.
I thought it would be picked by dpdk-next-net since it looked like a
tree-wide change.
Since its assigned to me, I will merge it in a day or so and let the
set take its course.

Thanks

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4218 bytes --]