From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F3BA0C43; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:26:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16834003F; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:26:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2314003E for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id h196so2233023iof.2 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:26:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V2/2ThHE+/8ehEeJp7cmh4ZV3m0WGAIYAjvSzRCNkAs=; b=Y8XXn6Xe8T1iU5DudUnIg6JeWiNoDmfbc3KBR8Qeg0ZuW7Jg0YWnjO+zX39MqkaR/c vSPKKMA202KiZRTwz8VkPxphv4lkW++K2IhRPa6nsZetKtAXP8IuDbYIZRblWJhAP/dT 3z//b34sCgc0KXkbTW8/1GTy/mNBDBWp4kZoE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V2/2ThHE+/8ehEeJp7cmh4ZV3m0WGAIYAjvSzRCNkAs=; b=Ly3P4OKzKJL5Edqcz/z4aFlSW+r2xicqH+ZcRxGDsPzdMLwmuDP5I42f9/ki7l+BDt ShdaRlMKuYAdj1vo27OJXhJteFcx7gQSF8bLn99iai3+ryx81qaWO4Xn2l0rY+DznvRT xfjSZh5u0ubmewB5omDt43CLHd9REaZJYZTEGFFrH3RxgzdoNJ/AWmhOX/FOsiVXkaYv sj6AoIHasVR2sR32qWeRcW6b02fbmcD9LpoyWosqgxNjr9v595ky6KLXBQboC0c/14EB cahyVKx09cZWtZ4jBENbGONWXdjI1gOZgooa7NjqcWw6ffVyBHH78oYrNFwOWbGGMWOD uprg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Si18G4GZ633+v6IAajlBSmulqRDF819rnnAndpid8y0rgtOiq RfXX1fL2v4hq3TOVIHlSxn++WP0L0RhkFXwWJX62vQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdCBPSgA207kZZ7hcERirdF33qGHd464jqVsOcTF3CGliNQ/QWvEhG7CRjkImwqXWgOojw0AyAnhry/jrxauo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2d81:: with SMTP id k1mr5179727iow.87.1634840794713; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:26:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211019123722.3414694-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> <20211021063503.3632732-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> <20211021063503.3632732-4-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20211021063503.3632732-4-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> From: Ajit Khaparde Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:26:18 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: dpdk-dev , Ori Kam , Ferruh Yigit , Somnath Kotur , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , Rahul Lakkireddy , Hemant Agrawal , Sachin Saxena , Haiyue Wang , John Daley , Hyong Youb Kim , Gaetan Rivet , Ziyang Xuan , Xiaoyun Wang , Guoyang Zhou , "Min Hu (Connor)" , Yisen Zhuang , Lijun Ou , Beilei Xing , Jingjing Wu , Qiming Yang , Qi Zhang , Rosen Xu , Liron Himi , Jerin Jacob , Rasesh Mody , Devendra Singh Rawat , Andrew Rybchenko , Jasvinder Singh , Cristian Dumitrescu , Keith Wiles , Jiawen Wu , Jian Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] net: advertise no support for keeping flow rules X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:36 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > > When RTE_ETH_DEV_CAPA_FLOW_RULE_KEEP capability bit is zero, > the specified behavior is the same as it had been before > this bit was introduced. Explicitly reset it in all PMDs > supporting rte_flow API in order to attract the attention > of maintainers, who should eventually choose to advertise > the new capability or not. It is already known that > mlx4 and mlx5 will not support this capability. > > For RTE_ETH_DEV_CAPA_FLOW_SHARED_OBJECT_KEEP > similar action is not performed, > because no PMD except mlx5 supports indirect actions. > Any PMD that starts doing so will anyway have to consider > all relevant API, including this capability. > > Suggested-by: Ferruh Yigit > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde