From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE64FA00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Sep 2019 08:01:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE85E1C43B;
	Mon,  2 Sep 2019 08:01:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-vk1-f176.google.com (mail-vk1-f176.google.com
 [209.85.221.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229B21C43A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Sep 2019 08:01:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id b144so2676282vkf.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 23:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=7OSLxhCZIAaElmWIxxhy8Y4WHGSHbbX9E8AYlSYzWLs=;
 b=lnBtYoPIg7ueMbu9e4l+AbJDKy8+fIJL8BxjGDUva0sFGjikItT8nIFBylE9/XifG/
 SacwvdOuw310UW9rYyen0yCGh5wGTkxAEI7Xiyg85wlCg1ga2FxOo4qWh7e+8VPNfE3s
 emMTwNj7zrq7dwEigT38wbQASUFurezjcayEDUWWukmG1Xy0J7lbL0UYpEytJtGBaiQn
 oF8RKaqn3UJBdSHN4CvI7DPyeOBYawfvZ8uPTuLqTSJNB36E7l7g/1sojpv0hvgaSUTO
 oLCISxK11rTVQe+aIklKy68TZTppYWMt348agPI8FiSDwckK61K5NkBYJdB42yge3raW
 LIKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=7OSLxhCZIAaElmWIxxhy8Y4WHGSHbbX9E8AYlSYzWLs=;
 b=mRUX0/TF1ypLruNPi8wB6yzEhHMKJ9lc1aRBmWZQnbfr4SWQOXkXqUySszDXrVsqKy
 /TPiDjiFC+WySykO/84EbwX6Hp8/rrWlZ7a0ZOvqf3spPuWvSl4L/J9unT5W5ONp+t9W
 9g6l+N2r57OolC1pSmlSqUhx45iYvggb5wodR4e43N9tZZYYxRZj9rOVkJKjK09CZial
 CFEddWa11ef3iKy83mmMZGqTltcsIUprrFH/pSMeNSFnYrpj/Xw8OPRyuDinMyU3ALyk
 fk1+NOnMx6zpg1pa+bPNlATZNtXAFU93ArMhwGdiCVTEZXxy0j1YH0+YEbxkBtQhAzhH
 1YWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpYDBehjVZtnxglxcjwN+aA58B4JPhlv9wjrXvFFQgM5clKzCw
 +6yuVzP7gEihePm61yZ5VMPK8S9X3/1nWX1c8qKIhw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhM3f8Hh2YbMS+KVnKfEZ44Gj2fjWaNfDlGE6ziuo/yEASi4GvDXEOVzE6fHkj5k1U9MFaKbUr0z3608YTBGI=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9b53:: with SMTP id d80mr13457002vke.69.1567404081157; 
 Sun, 01 Sep 2019 23:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: chetan bhasin <chetan.bhasin017@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 11:31:08 +0530
Message-ID: <CACZZ+Y6hD8eoQpQkSxbTLkYiHtkpHcAgJxgFU6C2aJ=_FEtk9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] mbuf in chain buffer has packet len as 0 ,
	will it impact TX?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello Everyone,

I have a use case where one of the buffer in a chain has packet-len 0 , Can
anybody suggest whether it will cause a problem while doing a TX ?

Thanks,
Chetan Bhasin