From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f44.google.com (mail-vk0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819372C00 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:40:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id s199so17133903vke.1 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imvisiontech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A4ZccSfdHV+OyBelELMG1nC/FEcz+nV3gVPUwsfbfNc=; b=R8ssZ2ZVccMGfAuRavDr2xhGJ/MvTxz6/O2WkTdQ2xgFFZbU+1mzwmOykYskqzjI0i y4uGktHJwC+TnGYFnw3I9oz3XoUraBMOS+7RZmlT22zlrZpGtHUTMgwsup6Sf1Pgb42x sVXUwWST8azy6I3hY2haxJfCpBSZ3q1UocdbSh/76mMjpVTEupODfh7pNqADNJnrPQ8p TxGCIJ+haRb3y5ovobGZIbu5ahZJPDJuswVxB93a+VHZjcNmQjLevvstenyyPmkAqOxv FyvcjMS8bFPVg5VZYCT41bmlKp1/k5Im4RHcVCntqYPO3B3itT3LqIuo+e+GzYqVo+bW Jbcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A4ZccSfdHV+OyBelELMG1nC/FEcz+nV3gVPUwsfbfNc=; b=thCPAWUqgIwYc+tsGhq1AXnZfGIByCW6b1wpvwN5/Hm0zupm/m/Q/Z/OsWBiHNW8Nq Vfb/5ypGrviioC2meOk1XL+P+d2REBnMHGl99aIcHmWNAcHx5LSvYDrNM775mzJDmJO8 9MS3twkd8KumSJuNkVnMlDlsXcd5ZWIuZXs3ooxYPRzJpvTlnV9rzGR7krN3NCy8OIfv MwQwxURnnujkKv5ysOr0lVu6PES5y7YWEe5L65OqBuyxWzkZUQ+Z8eSm7Jc5VMnYHezA x9OFk2xua5GgwIqpwql2NlS5h3Au8ZwH31cEemKsi9GX0hvYuBZ2Rr9tT+OUUomhhfr/ zIUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h8chEjoJql9F8vUmnO1T4gRHZoFy4SsE5CBjP2bUKzah3DuCf8 DACVYfP02dVB7xIV6sklThGqd40l7Imh X-Received: by 10.31.92.15 with SMTP id q15mr812005vkb.4.1504096843737; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.95.83 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Shirley Avishour Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:40:43 +0300 Message-ID: To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] errors while working with dpdk cuckoo hash X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:40:45 -0000 Hi Pablo, Attached are 2 files. one which contains the results and the other is the c code. I will attach the c file again. I managed to recreate the problem after upgrading to stable version dpdk-stable-16.11.2. Thanks, Shirley. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:37 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo < pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Shirley, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Shirley Avishour > > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 12:37 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] errors while working with dpdk cuckoo hash > > > > Hi, > > > > I am running an application over dpdk ver 16.04. > > My application massively inserting and deleting from a hash table using a > > key that can be very similar for many instances. > > I noticed that in some cases I am unable to find an entry while I am > certain > > it was inserted successfully. > > I wrote a test to try and reproduce the problem and I have managed to > > recreate the problem. > > Attached is a c file containing the test which recreates the problem. > > The key and hash function/hash size which I used in the test are > identical to > > what I use in my application. > > attached is also a file containing the printouts of the test and > indication to 2 > > of the problems I encountered. > > Are these known issues? is there a fix for that? > > Could you attach the code? I only see the results, but not the C code. > > Thanks, > Pablo > > > > > Thanks, > > Shirley >