From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23501DE0 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:08:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t75so856730oie.3 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 02:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Oq5EU2u0wIFp9aW0id2zjjnfSGkIo5CHSderUQNhDOI=; b=TUm9+BVsd4/9idn/KiCWlXP2fx3eqdfp3fwg+BkRQ3qBNccVZyiJERfhe1F4XPH/gy MWuMHDlFBaLqbsMfQMBwT6xzmReAQ0BbWI+wU86yyCUr9Tl8h0l+rTfkcXtDMyHX9T5u 6xBHDJBJuS3Zy+j6oNXDK6nfJe6BHEjFIg4eqL7C8R20nfsS7hG9DXH12WkmprKkhBKH uSbF73BlumztdngZZDpxt9awlPDjWqg7g7kAWYMSXQBq0izEAsh43Vs2RXsovBokALKi NM82VDcIqhdH8Mre1Syg/ms5VtAgDP9M1w7MsW6yoWkaki16N8bgIXcfEyQ3oO+Wgt6d Ynrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Oq5EU2u0wIFp9aW0id2zjjnfSGkIo5CHSderUQNhDOI=; b=SoJJiTUHf50QO8y7O+OgvpIkccq829kU6qAN77hpXX5Mxlu8ojSUG4W5u6+mJv+c3Q 9s9DzaPAmv8hE83c1186AapKTLl8dHqO4q1dPEDHUyQhDwjBUHcMjt8QNz64Pd4ByfgJ vEs92J00aKgtgQSQfL5bJy+BQ+dsJmY/dqRkqnKs0dx/kuO7Uyys0XJvq4n3biEcA2Eq l3+36Ir5JGWe5lmP8OwdNixerSeyN8Rdp7AVQSjz9lAX6Wpg0SuIcx9pmp+Jp5DEfRe5 GXPVY+nuxGMbN6D2qrkhkanaLAsMDBILZnPF7Bi0rYTJwdwvUwRwy2Jsxbgm9kkDeVqP h+hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUj1908XI/lX4W5AM8dYCyLy9jzlb3obKMRMaB/lBQ/F1f2Me15A TaSDB7065i7yR8XYZ2gl4fdMe/ktZQS2 X-Received: by 10.202.241.11 with SMTP id p11mr21706oih.244.1504170530413; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 02:08:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.33.212 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 02:08:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <76562c52-4870-4c08-64b1-41ef1e932093@intel.com> References: <1503591622-16232-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <1503591622-16232-4-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <76562c52-4870-4c08-64b1-41ef1e932093@intel.com> From: Alejandro Lucero Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:08:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] nfp: add support for new pci id X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:08:51 -0000 On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 8/24/2017 5:20 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > A NFP PF PCI devices can have PCI ID 4000 or 6000. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero > > <...> > > > @@ -2682,6 +2682,10 @@ static int nfp_pf_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver > *pci_drv __rte_unused, > > static const struct rte_pci_id pci_id_nfp_pf_net_map[] = { > > { > > RTE_PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NETRONOME, > > + PCI_DEVICE_ID_NFP4000_PF_NIC) > > I have seen nfp documentation updated with this new device, and I > believe it also worth updating release notes to mention new device > support (doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_11.rst) > > Yes, I agree. I should add this as well. > Also supported nics web page (http://dpdk.org/doc/nics), needs updating > (http://dpdk.org/browse/tools/dpdk-web/) > > Not sure about this one. I could not find any file in the repo for changing this. How should I manage it? > > + }, > > + { > > + RTE_PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NETRONOME, > > PCI_DEVICE_ID_NFP6000_PF_NIC) > <...> > >