From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.220.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0F4282
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  9 Jan 2015 15:12:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hy10so3225150vcb.6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 06:12:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type;
 bh=9QoWnHVIpq+/GKZbBYSLD30bHEMrAzMuO34ht7OjSyU=;
 b=MC0n1lpX7TZlMXGJyyiXGRiict1DBIpDrU24kgsap7X8qPUhpwi9PMH+xCaA8Ld70Y
 /1OLeV7kaMePr9nfhXo+R4wfOR+fAOb601AFve8YyRLXWobJH0XV2L8OHls8sTax8crx
 j5lTlNG8AEfhQx+YSvrrGkQHhIr8LQ1IJSDQ6QX+TT1fAjzCfzrTorzsnDpIunXJ25BH
 DyWSCEYN9Y60Hv6AgcPD7U+ATK0c73ZrVCTXc0CjYPvEGng41RH3zyXwImOztI44xF7W
 5bE2t9cUzqrCadikALvSDmX1cuCV/b6SMSJVr5AQc95XEfq5LRbwl43zUq9axIKw7yoL
 8Hsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmluyO9pxpAE2OTxuPLkz+PKAlLudplvsw3R+lRW4PAtjZa/NISyaw4Y/42yRDm9vM5E+OF
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.17.144 with SMTP id s16mr9893604vca.10.1420812730740;
 Fri, 09 Jan 2015 06:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.96.225 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 06:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:12:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD+H9911EO_0J_GRt34j-ugOSqeJo-QobNYc_cMe+52kvXLEfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
To: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] ret_pktmbuf_pool_init problem with opaque_arg
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:12:11 -0000

Inside this function mbuf_data_room_size is set to a default value if
opaque_arg is null and it should be set to the value pointed by opaque_arg
if not null. Current implementation is using not the value but with the
pointer itself. I think this:

        roomsz = (uint16_t)(uintptr_t)opaque_arg;

should be something like this:

        roomsz = *(uint16_t *)opaque_arg;