From: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] mem: add function for setting DMA mask
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:30:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD+H993iQqriLe=JBpa7=541tj7r7KkhD4D9fwA6QH7iOegb+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496b1e0-f3de-2a02-a5d9-3e6c65eb93d4@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:57 AM Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
wrote:
> On 01-Nov-18 10:48 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:11 AM Burakov, Anatoly
> > <anatoly.burakov@intel.com <mailto:anatoly.burakov@intel.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 31-Oct-18 5:29 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> > > This patch adds the possibility of setting a dma mask to be used
> > > once the memory initialization is done.
> > >
> > > This is currently needed when IOVA mode is set by PCI related
> > > code and an x86 IOMMU hardware unit is present. Current code calls
> > > rte_mem_check_dma_mask but it is wrong to do so at that point
> > > because the memory has not been initialized yet.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com
> > <mailto:alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>>
> > > ---
> > > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > > lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > > index e0f08f39a..24b72fcb0 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> > > @@ -480,6 +480,16 @@ rte_mem_check_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/* set dma mask to use when memory initialization is done */
> > > +void __rte_experimental
> > > +rte_mem_set_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits)
> > > +{
> > > + struct rte_mem_config *mcfg =
> > rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
> > > +
> > > + mcfg->dma_maskbits = mcfg->dma_maskbits == 0 ? maskbits :
> > > + RTE_MIN(mcfg->dma_maskbits, maskbits);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /* return the number of memory channels */
> > > unsigned rte_memory_get_nchannel(void)
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
> > b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
> > > index ad3f3cfb0..eff028db1 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
> > > @@ -466,6 +466,16 @@ unsigned rte_memory_get_nrank(void);
> > > /* check memsegs iovas are within a range based on dma mask */
> > > int __rte_experimental rte_mem_check_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * * @warning
> > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> >
> > I think there's a copy-paste error here (extra star and indent before
> > warning).
> >
> >
> > I will fix this.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > > + *
> > > + * Set dma mask to use once memory initialization is done.
> > > + * Previous function rte_mem_check_dma_mask can not be used
> > > + * safely until memory has been initialized.
> >
> > IMO this really requires a big bold warning saying that this function
> > must only be called early during initialization, before memory is
> > initialized, and not to be called in user code.
> >
> >
> > what about adding a new EAL variable for keeping memory initialization
> > status?
> > It would be something like "uninit" until is changed to "done" after the
> > memory initialization is completed.
> > That variable would help to avoid effective calls to set the dma mask
> > after initialization.
>
> I'm not opposed to it in principle, however, this is a slippery slope
> towards having each and every subsystem storing their init status :)
>
> That said, while it's not a complete solution because it won't prevent
> spurious calls to this function _after_ memory has initialized, there is
> a variable in internal_config that you can use to deny calls to this
> function after EAL init is complete (see internal_config->init_complete).
>
> You could also store a static variable in eal_common_memory.c, and
> change it at the end of rte_eal_memory_init() call, but that does not
> really complete the memory initialization, because we then go to
> rte_eal_malloc_heap_init(), which actually completes the memory init.
>
> I would greatly prefer using internal_config->init_complete - it is
> enough to forbid user code from calling it, while driver/DPDK developers
> presumably know what they're doing enough to read the warning and not
> try to call this after memory init :)
>
I agree that we should avoid new status variables as I proposed, and in
this case
I think using internal_config->init_complete will be enough.
I will add the check in the next version.
Thanks
>
> >
> > > + */
> > > +void __rte_experimental rte_mem_set_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * Drivers based on uio will not load unless physical
> > > * addresses are obtainable. It is only possible to get
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > index ef8126a97..ae24b5c73 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> > > @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > rte_devargs_remove;
> > > rte_devargs_type_count;
> > > rte_mem_check_dma_mask;
> > > + rte_mem_set_dma_mask;
> >
> > Same, this needs to be alphabetic.
> >
> > > rte_eal_cleanup;
> > > rte_fbarray_attach;
> > > rte_fbarray_destroy;
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Anatoly
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Anatoly
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-01 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-31 17:29 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] fix DMA mask check Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] mem: fix call to " Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:11 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mem: use proper prefix Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:08 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 10:40 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 14:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-01 15:03 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 16:18 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] mem: add function for setting DMA mask Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:11 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 10:48 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 11:30 ` Alejandro Lucero [this message]
2018-11-01 14:32 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] bus/pci: avoid call to DMA mask check Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:12 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] mem: modify error message for " Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 11:03 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 11:12 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 11:32 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] mem: add safe and unsafe versions for checking DMA mask Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 13:34 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] eal/mem: use DMA mask check for legacy memory Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:40 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 13:39 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 14:28 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 14:32 ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] fix DMA mask check Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-02 5:52 ` Hyong Youb Kim
2018-11-01 10:13 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-01 17:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAD+H993iQqriLe=JBpa7=541tj7r7KkhD4D9fwA6QH7iOegb+A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).