From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (mail-oi0-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0B86CBE for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:42:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id t73so16042918oie.1 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:42:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cV6F4Ld/yyxlMRaoex5zfVOfc4EvZWJEfWdm49xYNaE=; b=VM6T9lYQG3jdvgNFAk5J1KCE4Pje2D6rz4PTygMh4oUWxJW0FqKvDXSMQblnwVBEYm s0+M5Qqq4lO8WZSG843wMzfQbQR0tSCibGd1++cmLeIhSWlGIQD5PoTFF+X/kSGgQYHI 9FFP9dfOMqWPKxQGKMXUnewEuDB9zDjxTx9qk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cV6F4Ld/yyxlMRaoex5zfVOfc4EvZWJEfWdm49xYNaE=; b=BlywId4Mc44sQP10BsDvqltSgiXSY1m3pVqV3g/InFJ2N1W0P8bhQGihVx1bF5/vLh EGPMedJs4Ti7NwG27EwELNseMQV1GEBhqp+dvCABgVGXz7aUt9FGAeAN9ANRn5ZMO61p leJBTiCmFKTMbwZBl9Sq8CFrtUBM4AcCX/YsPlwW2TZUy1jEJGAof9ouDvkgASRJSmK8 IjvmZoH2sMVtdnFw2L7PFirmkyvqJXYNbV+km+YH1No7YSVYbgMHPLbJvd80tSOUabNG MnlI1//tqBtr3qkXQiQwbBY6EXwrZXcH2FsLtNXTzk7BhJCVAy31QYsKkfQWAKu+bAz8 2PBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkeEPeDKzyiHco4JSmIhUEdOWR1eJ/SA3yy5KafIGAW8tAhdh21+HCuarLorcCaMiGeK2Xrxz3wWLoAKrVk X-Received: by 10.202.50.67 with SMTP id y64mr1530246oiy.50.1476175346960; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:42:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.44.106 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:42:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1736050.3Z5tnqk6B6@xps13> <9398822.xtO6cvAGR1@xps13> From: Maxim Uvarov Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:42:26 +0300 Message-ID: To: Stephen Finucane Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:42:27 -0000 That is looks really good and should save a lot of time for maintainer taking already validated patches. How hard is connection between patchwork, mailing list tags and testing system? Is that all inside patchwork or you wrote it specially for dpdk? I would really like to have the same thing for my projects. Thank you, Maxim. On 10 October 2016 at 21:09, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > 2016-09-07 16:40, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > > > I am looking at it, and I see two issues: > > > - There are some patches that have been acked, but I don't see that in > patchwork > > > (e.g. http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15381/) > > > > Yes the new columns are empty. > > I guess they will be filled starting from now. > > Stephen, could we re-parse old emails (from August/September) to fill > > A/R/T without breaking the database? > > You sure can - use the 'retag' command [1]: > > ./manage.py retag > > I should probably have included that in the upgrade notes... > > Stephen > > [1] https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/blob/stable/1.1/patchwork/ > management/commands/retag.py