From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com (mail-yw0-f178.google.com [209.85.161.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D54FE5 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:50:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id t10so220547047ywa.0 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:50:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=callistech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=jWdXB4VkdrHUwPwyFtlZDeBhaTJvOLt8e1w0TRhxRpI=; b=kZ8kw8WuWTUe53fMxBpLsnMFHVZA3cWKwaFDUpxmFN0O8BJXEQGX4WM9t5Pm9J0xRW Ax7FuCERT920/S7QKuqwoxaSETzCDJJR3Acuq7UZrqANEraljBuj1BSd/KTQB2ACZYeR YbI0An+6UOryYwY1wPZla7kfR4KAZlJGRSI41Hv564QnCNSEO9VsSRh3YFPPlqvtjg8h tHWoFuomhk/2K8lxjMXuCOvgM6ZO9bejRC67ybnvS9lVKYXgwkwKmuVHm/2YYxeFfR8s ATOnHc+wA1VajLmHmkwm+w/ePZAnhKqJtBXWT/icJDgbDFBqJywYcj+39a+ZL7hCuvS+ 5IeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=jWdXB4VkdrHUwPwyFtlZDeBhaTJvOLt8e1w0TRhxRpI=; b=EkhboYWox9zPXfN9WGfilO8b4Jy06hmoFs4MkS5a/5lqoC0K5p1JiNWlMllEdtrbPQ gotiDTJ/8MqPpnna2i+6eAScB5qhu0ciZj4Izd5cqFU+eqbWPDcx4VmU8AZdt2WYAde7 717i7pHKHdL6LuBUMTNyP/mWOmM/SCWcHmenVX9uXiQYgokWyjvH3Qf4CdEj+VCeZCUt FpIvSt+Fu7MOB7KbDLiusXbFzNellW4u+TUKlgoIsT1UdIfnvZfHBFJFJL3d09aX4mgN tQvffpBUiqMHJVE6XeYSx//9pD0PPICHChYjsSjzX4uCfigfzsNltP+BFAuG+y+FbSTF THUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXJREp8+3DGc3IqVnh1vkFuEcgtRXD+IS+p1Pp1xJ/qmMVGDGytqFt5qkAjGVR9ylr5tMuETOOTihdvcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.37.6 with SMTP id l6mr2373942ybl.112.1462006235812; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.129.97.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.129.97.11 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:50:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <132784424.Pjq79LXnpm@xps13> References: <132784424.Pjq79LXnpm@xps13> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 05:50:35 -0300 Message-ID: From: Ariel Rodriguez To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue on rte_sched.c X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:50:36 -0000 Yes i am refereing on that commit. About RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_* , i agreed. I never prepare a patch ... maybe is time to put my hands on that. 2016-04-13 20:35, Ariel Rodriguez: > Hello, viewing the new code of librte_sched/ i found this line strange ... > > #if defined(__SSE4__) Are you refering to http://dpdk.org/commit/90f455f ? > if instead i use : > > #if defined(__SSE4_2__) || defined(__SSE4_1__) > > works like a charm ... > > i never see in any directive like __SSE4__ Indeed, it is strange. By the way, it is recommended to use RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_*.