From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797D9A0A0E;
	Fri,  7 May 2021 20:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306454013F;
	Fri,  7 May 2021 20:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-oi1-f170.google.com (mail-oi1-f170.google.com
 [209.85.167.170])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A1F40040
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  7 May 2021 20:56:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi1-f170.google.com with SMTP id m13so9579880oiw.13
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 07 May 2021 11:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=Rl9oFifVCjz9iZCsoR/ZNk9HPa0UlhrS0bdRY615Cl8=;
 b=OnHG1wyyFft/zlhijEW6xkrl2qwW4/l7Xt3qWh+a990w5vs0Pmadklk27ZdhEzuGjq
 esQNX6NIrZdKcwgQjEkArDRyO0j2EBXJvyJd+VAWiKfN2LGfMBZbTwNyD/phfhLz5BnI
 8kw/Q8R0JzgyyqhudU+/dzIzb4bVNICbC8OZA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Rl9oFifVCjz9iZCsoR/ZNk9HPa0UlhrS0bdRY615Cl8=;
 b=F9JNVbxc07gL+iTPDRZp3nGUPwrA+8WRhncreBrVdzPaZRqZf8nt1Sm/k/ygJpBdEj
 9WoQEqoFha4+H928xkH1Y72LcYX8vHoE1Bz+n8hxWYN5gakYCJaGxycCcDbobFJx/2Kf
 5NMk8nVL7Psh8SbSVVmGXSUVHvt3vLuJ54YErPDjLgvUIPW86C7XgtzNsgv/jt+r6wya
 XqX/wr0nK+xYCcRq14hmNIJaBP3jaycNAGVK31QhnVo3CHk6JB13apQiiU9cLdUOVC9/
 XM7+M6AdNGYCkted9Bod3gF9sodbHgRE7pZk9j+HILlt3bU+H3ljZ91tcPjZykw81Ldp
 mkHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gKSCf4zKiG1cxrWd+8h49XFdlMWd81cbMgZvy/JBVYqAYbJHC
 Tx+48XMHKC1YdLAE0Q3LE6grYupgKezYrbhPmo6jhw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5x1aH8K46FjJaNDtbMToKLVweEcFn2AA+Cpma+2rd0CvNuqOAmdQr/7NxDTSMUQKd41KGmZwXmXOcpITnRGI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:211a:: with SMTP id 26mr8016231oiz.19.1620413759801;
 Fri, 07 May 2021 11:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210507181025.84012-1-lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
 <CADyeNECkwnsu6510b8cO2ALHMCNXuddJNr0fv+A8ytrFLtzsUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyeNECkwnsu6510b8cO2ALHMCNXuddJNr0fv+A8ytrFLtzsUA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 14:55:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyeNEAeupRDf2S21w-oa0tpnud1O5QnSRm7DjsaQuC7TezOyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>, 
 Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>,
 Dmitry Malloy <dmitrym@microsoft.com>, 
 Pallavi Kadam <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
 micalg=sha-256; boundary="00000000000090206605c1c1fa91"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix memory mapping for 32-bit targets
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

--00000000000090206605c1c1fa91
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> Windows compilation is failing in CI, apparently Windows doesn't
> understand "off_t".
>
> Should we add an "rte_off_t" definition for non-POSIX portability?

On second thought, it's probably better to simply use uint64_t.

--00000000000090206605c1c1fa91--