From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E845A034F; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:12:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372CB40E03; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:12:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com (mail-yb1-f180.google.com [209.85.219.180]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343AA4068B for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:12:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id v64so54236579ybi.5 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:12:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YMv0i76zNqqcNkiLsylrTPQBGI6fnawMQ/3ZA7ccEDg=; b=X+9dpqBV6C7gV63f1iWxV2GfZ0sVX5eSGvQk63zMaF9eyK1uvTeAIgKvJjQOk7s+ij 035u1Rmd4PyIoU5KCsjL2kymsurQ7jMFr8B0gnp7nFPyoEwrxEewThjqhPe3m6y76aIW JO4KxaP3mpL0k5mlYqGJs5Swgr75L6KjF1KKM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YMv0i76zNqqcNkiLsylrTPQBGI6fnawMQ/3ZA7ccEDg=; b=p0skE6CT3tJJ/MhWsB54EKtaMuWvI5Jgyqsd8SLk2U7TWxChi1T+Volc1IIfjCKp8y XKBp9FIQIc/gBiyFcSJxRA4yzI3adRu9SskBhryENXcqBLv4hiOUYB+gsgpdfQQh5lH8 9+RlnO9jNNw9HxG2/w45/VTwrJx8krpx/mSbJTm9H01CWfNJqqflsLALGDafOXaZb7bJ tqshNueiw6YabZHnSfJ/UXeVUS7f45l90umzTi494i9CzScTWDpaUr5sTvLiKrQoR+oR QIJgiwokCPSGKWTqnC4XWIMuE9n9ACsXmzh0aYplPe+iQQGL5+2Nrj0pGhDYyQfnN4AX 3v9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pNsPHNJHjLenc91mSIWKX4otV76guryoh0vjN6Gqju2M6A/Go AcaeptL7tAYhiGS2kHfFB8i87ppYlzOx+x/kkBtOxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwx/oYK63rSTYqn19uMHgBjkigiOqnfHAgQKf3Hak+BKH+L1995j/4/y/mNuoJR0QHivVp7uV2KLIQ1LEXR+D4= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:648:: with SMTP id o8mr10287473ybq.208.1636474352490; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:12:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2761655.DagZRsOc3m@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2761655.DagZRsOc3m@thomas> From: Lance Richardson Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:12:21 -0500 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin , David Marchand , dev , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Build failures in 21.11-rc2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Do the machines used for the CentOS 8 CI builds support AVX512? The failing build is on an Ice Lake server with: meson -Dmachine=3Dnative build ninja -C build On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:08 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote= : > > 09/11/2021 16:57, David Marchand: > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Lance Richardson > > wrote: > > > > > > 21.11-rc2 builds are failing on CentOS 8.4, apparently because > > > the intrinsic _mm512_set_epi8() is not defined in the GCC > > > headers (see example below). > > > > Thanks for reporting Lance. > > It rings a bell, think it was mentionned in the past. > > CI compilation was passing: > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-November/238534.html > I would like to better understand. > > [...] > > > Here is a GCC patch to add this intrinsic: > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg188664.html > > > > > > BTW, GCC 10.2.1 (via "scl enable gcc-toolset-10") is able to build > > > 21.11-rc2 successfully on CentOS 8.4. > > > > > > Lance > > > > > > # gcc --version > > > gcc (GCC) 8.4.1 20200928 (Red Hat 8.4.1-1) > [...] > > > ../lib/hash/rte_thash_x86_gfni.h:59:24: error: implicit declaration o= f > > > function =E2=80=98_mm512_set_epi8=E2=80=99; did you mean =E2=80=98_mm= 512_set1_epi8=E2=80=99? > > What is different in your setup compared to the CI? > >