From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D06A034F; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:22:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A640E28; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:22:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yb1-f170.google.com (mail-yb1-f170.google.com [209.85.219.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B3540E03 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:22:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yb1-f170.google.com with SMTP id v64so54316179ybi.5 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:22:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ankUhSiNwtUVLB2XpeJud8lIviUeuFlDskSHF8wCvs8=; b=Wd0BSEa2jrUWJWZT63zXzZizLKjrCNJfIggW2ziVxRFy2Cz89mFjzQJ5/9uzrOO/3v coZvs+VPE92OAhaUOerYzK1UgjD1saHNvRCal+iZLEEd5uviAPl6VaBYsr/LFwx1VC7T SX1qS/K8DjvR30gYHH4jrBZ9J5p7EHG1O/aII= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ankUhSiNwtUVLB2XpeJud8lIviUeuFlDskSHF8wCvs8=; b=7vDP8SeVm8CRBLtG4txYV0UfEQYhtkU8aTQ0ZebWUoiqxXr4lLAuL0+k4wEfx80hiU 4rqojlYq8kWo+BVoUNg0EoPI7F+9dAtmbVjbthmn0zfYPJ70Obb0LkNRiV1IPBBxpJCP Q2xSaJDAENRaXihLTJJq2dftdU9iymd1AUVux9uDWvTEi5hEZAZQX442cSXDHVzZJ80V C4njaOqAw2VzKoj+nCb8/rB8lez5rWR3WBQMCrhVuhTPWLNAH79EJ9bwdMeb7CYVzjKx ihKTcl5lVhmPKCs1/xXumE3TqJ6UJHBnymOSVMmql8toiI4fHjayfE7a0z9k6E7gTgef CwsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Bfvdus5lpYFNAW9RLFRV8GgMvwYlRfsxrLCf4kNIPg+WZvV1O Fwyj5C1OKOz6GKXyeSr2DQr2q/jHQHW1SfDcTMpnQQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUDSvsjlJoYKuomqACfj+E2CsJAaILHH1fQnO0YUs8C6vMt6hgf9Xfsu2BSfS94AfeCjG/5NsvYaqFJQOQUTA= X-Received: by 2002:a25:3b54:: with SMTP id i81mr8908648yba.541.1636474974482; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:22:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2761655.DagZRsOc3m@thomas> <3764013.fqriFq5c1J@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3764013.fqriFq5c1J@thomas> From: Lance Richardson Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:22:43 -0500 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin , David Marchand , dev , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Build failures in 21.11-rc2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Based on the CI build logs, the target architecture was Skylake, which supports AVX512 but doesn't support GFNI. On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:15 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote= : > > 09/11/2021 17:12, Lance Richardson: > > Do the machines used for the CentOS 8 CI builds support AVX512? > > Probably not. OK thank you. > > > The failing build is on an Ice Lake server with: > > meson -Dmachine=3Dnative build > > ninja -C build > > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:08 AM Thomas Monjalon w= rote: > > > 09/11/2021 16:57, David Marchand: > > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Lance Richardson > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > 21.11-rc2 builds are failing on CentOS 8.4, apparently because > > > > > the intrinsic _mm512_set_epi8() is not defined in the GCC > > > > > headers (see example below). > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting Lance. > > > > It rings a bell, think it was mentionned in the past. > > > > > > CI compilation was passing: > > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-November/238534.html > > > I would like to better understand. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > Here is a GCC patch to add this intrinsic: > > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg188664.ht= ml > > > > > > > > > > BTW, GCC 10.2.1 (via "scl enable gcc-toolset-10") is able to buil= d > > > > > 21.11-rc2 successfully on CentOS 8.4. > > > > > > > > > > Lance > > > > > > > > > > # gcc --version > > > > > gcc (GCC) 8.4.1 20200928 (Red Hat 8.4.1-1) > > > [...] > > > > > ../lib/hash/rte_thash_x86_gfni.h:59:24: error: implicit declarati= on of > > > > > function =E2=80=98_mm512_set_epi8=E2=80=99; did you mean =E2=80= =98_mm512_set1_epi8=E2=80=99? > > > > > > What is different in your setup compared to the CI? > > >