From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C646DA053A;
	Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:06:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57D62A62;
	Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:06:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (mail-ot1-f44.google.com
 [209.85.210.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7FC2956
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:06:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id b18so3253873otp.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:06:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=oqM6wQW4gdNwNStd/f7PgCvSQWzLPa6zDHpIKniu9Ss=;
 b=JodRFXPPp+gRHF8thzkr+iMKN7VbhHU66OnXQKD9HbwdqjP/zp/d3wbTLTlut4MNBw
 of0xQJ05zDovo9vPXFxqZvIcMlHwsy44wEWlJZRbmhIlTLBjfg5ZcNOxDchYyqWQVAt7
 FDNykq+dHexAzps6kM8bBYs6kX3wt9iIE6BG8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=oqM6wQW4gdNwNStd/f7PgCvSQWzLPa6zDHpIKniu9Ss=;
 b=OkHgZZrpJC3mtnJfrOCVkxSQOOrnqc6qXdLsaYclQE8vWP6txQkIHanDSruQ/kLk01
 sUZp1o6tF4r2190HsDGj1xBad+uUV+HCzxo0M4RVT2lw6CU24VXw5sJmqHSSwkJeZXs8
 nrCkpKeHd/udCNCOHXz2k1fSjfrDShjmvBQyvotJgH5turrHEcC+Ii5gPBGIZCNOZewJ
 HlKR6QpVXTocv+2UemNl4iVYVgyMdXXYNVl6ENafV5jCzy/ybqJkqjBDlsOMO3DUV7w6
 vP/D6AjmCVlnHIz3a1f0pde0i0Ccypudx8MwitGs/acuGaKaa2iqFLdEafwckd0yM/3b
 P4GQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUp/6PIqZw92cTIwO90DQzpQjMFt7ZFHBJ+9Dc5j4TlUaFvitYB
 kepfO2kWF+GoEsUAKACjUDWH6nuKeyTk8UxL3LDHMs8x
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyl0hXv9MKshunjjwrfsvvZM6r8jUFgt1v3XVcL2wCfCPbw0dQi1X4szStzrrj1L8Tmqe80p8x1MXiVu4OWz0E=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3e16:: with SMTP id a22mr12405327otd.259.1579795568694; 
 Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:06:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:05:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyeNEDOtD+4wZGX42FgZBLPM0yJ_tSVh6e0Or+J2o7zfgK9Dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

The DPDK Coding Style document doesn't mention the use of c99 comments
using '//' as a comment delimiter, but it does say that traditional
'/*  */' comment
delimiters should be used and therefore seems to imply that c99-style comments
are not allowed.

Is this correct?

   Lance