From: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:43:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADyeNEDqFakWx=q_=tvCwsxtsEBE8thEMoPoXTZ5x-BVXucHqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200123081518.4c836e60@hermes.lan>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:15 AM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:05:58 -0500
> Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> > The DPDK Coding Style document doesn't mention the use of c99 comments
> > using '//' as a comment delimiter, but it does say that traditional
> > '/* */' comment
> > delimiters should be used and therefore seems to imply that c99-style comments
> > are not allowed.
> >
> > Is this correct?
> >
> > Lance
>
> Don't use c99 comments.
> These will get flagged by checkpatch
Hi Stephen,
Actually, the reason I was asking was they aren't being flagged by checkpatch.
It seems checkpatch.pl now has this:
my $allow_c99_comments = 1; # Can be overridden by --ignore
C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE
If c99 comments are should not be allowed, it looks like
C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE should
be added to the list of checkers to ignore in checkpatches.sh. I was
thinking of rolling a patch,
but wanted to first confirm that they are actually not allowed.
Thanks,
Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-23 16:05 Lance Richardson
2020-01-23 16:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-23 16:43 ` Lance Richardson [this message]
2020-01-24 17:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-24 21:37 ` Lance Richardson
2020-02-15 17:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] devtools: check c99 comment use in checkpatches.sh Lance Richardson
2020-02-22 19:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADyeNEDqFakWx=q_=tvCwsxtsEBE8thEMoPoXTZ5x-BVXucHqQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lance.richardson@broadcom.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).