From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89A5A0C41; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B74C40141; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com (mail-wr1-f45.google.com [209.85.221.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8134003C for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:21:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id a11so5220999wrt.13 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 23:21:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=globaledgesoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ooJoad+v0+KplvU6IYDtXEENPXcg1OPU1zBjf5tT0ZQ=; b=zxY28uRS6lzHBxL7sWob/E1DM8+kbf7CDWhYMyJ3iu+cgKYpsolf079iweuooLBOKe qmWiBls/kkR+iWLft4+gxCze3MhtOv5U44SS93DsFRyrHbSEma9YcMdydsBX20hvQkuq /Iua8rizt8wPAUdn6MT+FAYpwnmXF+vsjQHo3XQzNR5k/YNBuNJt036wiweXTHkAUKhu 9k8oDf0GL6TDGyemLLAdlSR/jtwOTBgQUm6VX1ucej0st0nh8gSYWFPJmqZpVWaTJsVH ZOk9qLEI1KOfedf+tuxhR1GP9iECr8NF09wo+4mt4R650KfI87hfFJCPvjgPgXmXCzVR bYgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ooJoad+v0+KplvU6IYDtXEENPXcg1OPU1zBjf5tT0ZQ=; b=SCSC9ydF3EVVLa42DJEh4Q8hurzuXfkB6Yr9SknpGjywY/gZb6t97VjqvHhXqq6mNc CiazF41q51VK+KBstEYp5vOu1G1plVFPNChBkE5ShBGe7MvRXPck8/u8BG8ORLnR/8KW 81x+yLlW2IhQf8MEu/7KqWFPu5NzSrRC1myzkd52xbmtomnWsq/yL5V0AhFiAykFKaXs MJi+BGUtCaMO9rYVsap8JeogI4t9rWOCyaKurNE6BALbPztuDdO3P59j3wzQYx1R4dEc GQ+TDqWpNV+UGVR3BdoUSxNyhJ03bXFCNzGIGCyaeO6J9Euk8u+z1wOTSJ0SVGtqcAW0 o4vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532SVavzZAJQxLQPY+m8CgvKeVfxK/vb86EoEqXwHZHxpntcSTaC 4VDLvtg63q8RS54Oax9wGakNtkjlER8ZU/mnn9acfchH24M5TTeWEoS4FTWnr1kQdLaxS0ehMDy uoqwN5A6i0KuwMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwPw9Al7Z/6sASlSLhP3SzFBRgf/wWPzrj/Ls+h4JurqDvSKbq6fJOuXgWW9/La6CjJyT8nIvQgZYv+7Pt6mg= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e551:: with SMTP id z17mr2393826wrm.320.1624515670110; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 23:21:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210610111839.7481-1-s.chandrakant@globaledgesoft.com> <2086868.Y7UdBn2X1H@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Supriya Shekhar Mane Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:51:00 +0530 Message-ID: To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" , Chandrakant Sharpa , "dev@dpdk.org" , Zaheer R M , Gurusidhesh G H , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , Jan Viktorin , "jerinj@marvell.com" , Honnappa Nagarahalli , nd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Add Armv7 support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Ruifeng, > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:05 PM Ruifeng Wang wrote: > > Do you have any plan on CI? > I don't think DPDK Lab has Armv7 hardware to run tests. Yes, we do have plans for CI for armv7, We are currently conducting our testing with WPJ419 platform. I would like to note what all things that should be taken into consideration for making CI support for armv7 related contributions. Aso, we would like know how the testing for armv7 was done in older DPDK releases, and what all things were considered, so that we can follow the same. Regards, Supriya Mane -- Disclaimer:This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. Please notify the sender by e-mail and delete this message. GlobalEdge does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.