From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f195.google.com (mail-lb0-f195.google.com [209.85.217.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101C32BA9 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:54:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lb0-f195.google.com with SMTP id vk4so1858324lbb.1 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:54:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=4w/Jdt4jHytZxCU7VnFXv8bUTYA+SwyEtvQEcrU/3T0=; b=TDAEUL9KkqkiTmexJ/kghTnJhE+yKGH2UjA144I7zhNBvMoOBPo8fxc4i7fB6y5+D7 C91chwVEiBZLJjKVYns7d1GdmUKVtqy31Ds0j5WBB3yrVzo/g6nIXuo8Qft14+RoyIpv 1oc07cq0UxXfO9EkYIDTJY9kHcSmRFqZxPq5k4LQF2Gei+gTJnIW7IhLNAgv7ZJ321aC k4s75Od/B/zwVAF3E802dXGupj68Q8ndyxbELCVDoIiKyTzu2HYFMM1uTdWhoe/YHvHK rbQhZTA/hyex3rDEkHFfRhFsHw27fQu00U9EPZDLBGZrMVqVhXTtyOTh271HwPPjqkQd ONKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4w/Jdt4jHytZxCU7VnFXv8bUTYA+SwyEtvQEcrU/3T0=; b=m8KlT1e2BA5VTxeB5qbUiX21C9bOEdMH9Nz7MM9JcqWQ7cA1bJlIPwd3Tv7RqiRLBM friCceHcjivzqSTAF/p2ClWIRLmlHxZeV+SEH6bW7jO3uwT9gkBb0l+LlKQeT+cPXDJK eBMHjZEsjidpHdzKShmXt9ft/x2Ultcb3mQHT5/SYobg4onD/BZKQ0FLbTA9mAEjMx04 zTfSuDQG340ij07Z68Fa+5UwKI2eRq4/4MZTcBhXSJ3FWCL1Qq41/PNfJdAo/hPXqgiW EG7PSLCzQsSwumS3x//vnrVj6YcEb33ebRNMyL88xcjaRDIwwmIyJF21DncKf0WX9rsr 4KPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIOUTAehP8Y6AaT2mhb5dTlfriQJARy2GZprPXk8T+EQ7s3aRxL4LSptiYgQzVWsHs90Cp3zKEi01bnAw== X-Received: by 10.112.201.67 with SMTP id jy3mr2087771lbc.25.1458766472537; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:54:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: marc.sune@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.155.196 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E0320DDBD@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1457992546-32230-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1458238145-7496-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <6484751.SCnO9hFmr5@xps13> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E0320DDBD@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Marc Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:54:12 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6cQc-A8ziM1pVZXWz_ciAfoqB50 Message-ID: To: "Xu, Qian Q" Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "Zhang, Helin" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:54:33 -0000 Qian, On 23 March 2016 at 02:18, Xu, Qian Q wrote: > We have tested with intel nic and found port can't be started for all > nics:ixgbe/i40e/igb/bonding, see attached mail for more details. Please > check and fix it. > > > Thanks > Qian > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:59 AM > To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin > Cc: marcdevel@gmail.com; Richardson, Bruce; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API > refactoring > > 2016-03-17 19:08, Thomas Monjalon: > > There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for > > autonegotiation with Intel devices (patch #6). > > I would not be surprised to see some bugs in this rework. > > Any feedback about autoneg in e1000/ixgbe/i40e? > Has it been tested before its integration in RC2? > > > The capabilities must be adapted per device. It can be improved in a > > separate patch. > > > > It will be integrated in 16.04-rc2. > > Please test and review shortly, thanks! > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Xu, Qian Q" > To: "Cao, Waterman" , "Glynn, Michael J" < > michael.j.glynn@intel.com> > Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" , "Zhu, Heqing" < > heqing.zhu@intel.com>, "O'Driscoll, Tim" , > "Mcnamara, John" , "Xu, HuilongX" < > huilongx.xu@intel.com>, "Fu, JingguoX" , "Xu, Qian > Q" , "Zhang, Helin" > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 06:41:37 +0000 > Subject: RE: DPDK link speed with Intel devices > Hi, all > We have worked out the basic test cases for the patchset. > 1. Test the link speed on major Intel NICs to see if the speed is right. > 2. Test the auto-negoation on major Intel NICs to ensure it's working. > Nic covered: ixgbe, igb, i40e, fm10k, bonding(SW), virtio(SW) > > When we run the Test#1 for all major NICs. We found that all these NIC > port(igb, ixgbe, i40e, fm10k) can't be started. Pls check, if the patch is > applied, all INTEL port can't be start, terrible things! > > Interactive-mode selected > Configuring Port 0 (socket 0) > PMD: ixgbe_dev_tx_queue_setup(): sw_ring=0x7f13e99e3440 > hw_ring=0x7f13e99e5480 dma_addr=0x8299e5480 > PMD: ixgbe_set_tx_function(): Using simple tx code path > PMD: ixgbe_set_tx_function(): Vector tx enabled. > PMD: ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(): sw_ring=0x7f13ffcb8080 > sw_sc_ring=0x7f13ffcbaac0 hw_ring=0x7f13e99d3380 dma_addr=0x8299d3380 > PMD: ixgbe_dev_start(): Invalid link_speeds for port 0; autonegotiation > disabled > Fail to start port 0 > Configuring Port 1 (socket 0) > PMD: i40e_set_tx_function_flag(): Vector tx can be enabled on this txq. > PMD: i40e_dev_rx_queue_setup(): Rx Burst Bulk Alloc Preconditions are > satisfied. Rx Burst Bulk Alloc function will be used on port=1, queue=0. > PMD: i40e_dev_start(): Invalid link_speeds for port 1; autonegotiation > disabled > Just to double-check; is the test#1 adapted to the _new_ API that ethdev has to set link speeds? For the output it seems autoneg is disabled => fixed speed, hence the new bitmaps have to be used. (I am not claiming patchset is bug free; there might be issues still) Regards marc Fail to start port 1 > Please stop the ports first > Done > > Thanks > Qian > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cao, Waterman > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:06 AM > To: Glynn, Michael J > Cc: Richardson, Bruce; Zhu, Heqing; O'Driscoll, Tim; Mcnamara, John; Xu, > Qian Q; Cao, Waterman > Subject: RE: DPDK link speed with Intel devices > > Hi Mike, > > We just knew this patch set last week. > Since this patch set is required to test with a lot of NIC, we > need more document from Dev about this patch. > Currently, Qian is working on with Wenzhuo on it now. > > Waterman > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glynn, Michael J > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:31 AM > To: Cao, Waterman > Cc: Richardson, Bruce ; Zhu, Heqing < > heqing.zhu@intel.com>; O'Driscoll, Tim ; > Mcnamara, John > Subject: FW: DPDK link speed with Intel devices > Importance: High > > Hi Waterman, all > > See below - are you aware? And if so where are we with testing/resolution? > > Regards > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 2:19 PM > To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; Glynn, Michael J < > michael.j.glynn@intel.com>; Zhu, Heqing > Cc: vincent.jardin@6wind.com > Subject: DPDK link speed with Intel devices > > Hi, > > We are still waiting for test feedbacks for this important patchset: > ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring It is possible that it > breaks the autonegotiation in e1000/ixgbe/i40e. > > Thanks for taking care. > >