From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183E95937 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id fh2so26403455igd.1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:12:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=awakenetworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=cc/oxDK6q/1eVQIr+0ha66ZnBtispGgmFooX5QFsgBQ=; b=W/2plkMhTVlnjtyUO6HwRPMpzyAnybk09v207vpQ1iu0cbaUpltFY1gvdfKqChvsme iIdeprZxWr1Ad9O76is8B+P5oWDSFXjXwOfxI5u0YXMRJjI5uWy0DoPg2bMIntd+kQ+Y 4aCRbUMW31ZRP8x3T1DuzCV2pzYKilL7y2PPFoU4tcQxORLQbksZGWv/l9PjtwOmKgWg /Jtk4cKLX0xCa570c4fvq/nNViKu+HNHf5TM8GcNC3NqntNnRzXK+DxYuG7F4Qc5kcGC wsEW0UOXe2z5gsEmc2nDLXLrYjTIPDvt5FKos+abSgYFqzfxC6m/oPlO9r9uL0bVPpv5 1sTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=cc/oxDK6q/1eVQIr+0ha66ZnBtispGgmFooX5QFsgBQ=; b=gzy3sbfPIIFVi+WaovN2L4mplWrUVYCZ5+GSHwGAH24bn9qBdBU2Dc3uDxY/wHiSDf XGJ7B8KtIzPIzE9YOtO6CmqSZ6n4Zq4KoflWKUzYG72NVr6mzTaOBYvr59WmwAccVN/y Vb4I81fc1A0tr39IBc5wwtn0hOZ7/YwLHUDPnPxVPQfEjyl+dEoUe5iBQyl47wGMawOJ VPj5PO0qaKQ4Yji1Sw+mIPuHCr4etg7CZxa1cXEuzP/znVaZlnzD4LJEdt/ovaB9kf3w HQeX1DHVpW6jdPoW+vJRUKrOD7WWB4dJd51VdTmb7YLTkRK5kW+sKEoUcFX7aYSHWJOl WycQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUI2SBkbIdAqOaegmgonwPSy6wnb2oIK9IYfBvwk1qph7M/3AoztSE7a/euovuezt5tcmYR+VNkaDxxOzkv MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.56.13 with SMTP id w13mr13141220igp.19.1464023553510; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.84.198 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:12:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5743398C.1090504@intel.com> References: <1463815522-27916-1-git-send-email-ee07b291@gmail.com> <1463815522-27916-2-git-send-email-ee07b291@gmail.com> <57433746.5040303@intel.com> <5743398C.1090504@intel.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:12:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Alex Wang To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Alex Wang , dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:37:07 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v2] kni: Add documentation for the mempool capacity X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:12:34 -0000 Shoooot, sorry for missing that, sending V3, On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 5/23/2016 6:00 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 5/21/2016 8:25 AM, Alex Wang wrote: > >> From: Alex Wang > >> > >> Function like 'rte_kni_rx_burst()' keeps > >> allocating 'MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM' mbufs to > >> kni fifo queue unless the queue's capacity > >> ('KNI_FIFO_COUNT_MAX') is reached. So, if > >> the mempool is under-provisioned, user may > >> run into "Out of Memory" logs from KNI code. > >> This commit documents the need to provision > >> mempool capacity of more than > >> "2 x KNI_FIFO_COUNT_MAX" for each KNI interface. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alex Wang > > > > Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit > > > > Hi Alex, > > This is detail but I just recognized patch subject after tag starts with > uppercase. Would you mind sending another patch? You can keep my ack > with it. > > Thanks, > ferruh >