Got it. I’ll update the patch.

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 9:52 AM Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 06:38:23PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 20/02/2023 18:21, Bili Dong:
> > > The naming is following the existing CRC32 hash:
> > >
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v22.11.1/source/lib/hash/rte_hash_crc.h#L168
> .
> > > I believe all existing hash functions in DPDK are 32 bits, so "32"
> didn't
> > > appear in other hash function names. If we add "32" here, we probably
> > > should also rename rte_hash_crc(). I'm fine with either option.
> >
> > Why all functions would be 32-bit?
> > I don't think we need to rename all.
> > We can just make the right thing when adding a new function.
> >
> > What maintainers of rte_hash think?
> >
> +1 to adding the 32 for clarity.
>
> If we want consistency, it's easy enough to create some aliases for the
> existing functions with the "32" extension on them. No need to remove the
> old names so there would be no compatibility issues.
>