From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"skhare@vmware.com" <skhare@vmware.com>,
Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: try physical address if virtual address fails
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:03:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG2-Gkmj5kfvyLP45tVKUkxcphP4ZU1bLThtb7aDbd92TWQ5vQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG2-GknkhiN=cuX_rwfN1Afq5aSVsWnmHBVAkgQbA5r3E0wUPA@mail.gmail.com>
OK, I found a machine in our local collection that couldn't get by with
this patch, so I will submitting a follow up that forces
rte_eval_iova_mode() into PA mode.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi William:
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chas Williams
>> > Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2017 7:57 AM
>> > To: dev@dpdk.org
>> > Cc: skhare@vmware.com; Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>; Chas
>> > Williams <chas3@att.com>
>> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: try physical address if virtual
>> address fails
>> >
>> > Some machines appear to have buggy DMAR mappings. A typical mapping
>> > error looks like:
>> >
>> > DMAR: intel_iommu_map: iommu width (39) is not sufficient for the
>> > mapped address (7fc4fa800000)
>> > DMAR: intel_iommu_map: iommu width (39) is not sufficient for the
>> > mapped address (7fc4fa800000)
>> > DMAR: intel_iommu_map: iommu width (39) is not sufficient for the
>> > mapped address (7fc4fa800000)
>> > DMAR: intel_iommu_map: iommu width (39) is not sufficient for the
>> > mapped address (7fc4fa800000)
>> >
>> I met the same issue on some intel atom platform, the root cause is IOMMU
>> only support 39 bit virtual address.
>> Not sure retry with physical address will be the right fix. I saw
>> rte_eal_iova_mode is called at other place, it still take the virtual
>> address as the mapped result, does that break something?
>> So far the workaround may works by using --virtbase-addr to assign a
>> address in range explicitly (for example 0x70,0000,0000)
>> Regards
>> Qi
>>
>
> I don't think the IOVA usage elsewhere is an issue since I limited my
> changes to reworking what was done in commit e85a919286d2 which appears to
> be what broken things for me.
>
> It's not clear that passing --base-virtaddr is a workable solution.
> First, it's only a hint to mmap(). The kernel really can do whatever it
> wants. And then, what values do I pick? If one value fails, do I just
> restart and keep trying new values until it succeeds? I just want to fall
> back to the previous behavior. I know the physical mapping will succeed
> since the DMAR tables are limited to 36 bits in width.
>
> And yes, I should update the commit to blame the IOMMU width.
>
>
>>
>> > To work around this, attempt to do a physical address mapping if the
>> virtual
>> > address mapping fails.
>> >
>> > Fixes: e85a919286d2 ("vfio: honor IOVA mode before mapping")
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>
>> > ---
>> > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c
>> > b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c
>> > index 58f0123..6250676 100644
>> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c
>> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c
>> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>> > #include <fcntl.h>
>> > #include <unistd.h>
>> > #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> > +#include <stdbool.h>
>> >
>> > #include <rte_log.h>
>> > #include <rte_memory.h>
>> > @@ -702,6 +703,7 @@ vfio_type1_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>> > /* map all DPDK segments for DMA. use 1:1 PA to IOVA mapping */
>> > for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_MEMSEG; i++) {
>> > struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_map dma_map;
>> > + int retried = false;
>> >
>> > if (ms[i].addr == NULL)
>> > break;
>> > @@ -716,9 +718,15 @@ vfio_type1_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>> > dma_map.iova = ms[i].iova;
>> > dma_map.flags = VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_READ |
>> > VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE;
>> >
>> > +retry:
>> > ret = ioctl(vfio_container_fd, VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA,
>> > &dma_map);
>> >
>> > if (ret) {
>> > + if (!retried && rte_eal_iova_mode() ==
>> RTE_IOVA_VA) {
>> > + dma_map.iova = ms[i].iova;
>>
>>
>> > + retried = true;
>> > + goto retry;
>> > + }
>> > RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, " cannot set up DMA remapping,
>> "
>> > "error %i (%s)\n", errno,
>> > strerror(errno));
>> > --
>> > 2.9.5
>> Regards
>> Qi
>>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-30 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-24 23:57 Chas Williams
2017-11-27 9:30 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2017-11-27 12:58 ` Chas Williams
2017-11-30 2:03 ` Chas Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG2-Gkmj5kfvyLP45tVKUkxcphP4ZU1bLThtb7aDbd92TWQ5vQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=3chas3@gmail.com \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=skhare@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).