From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0198D35 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:41:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ba1so401802700obb.3 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HRC8TEtgimAKP87zZ82d8o/mw+tNM07v5QtYV/gfcl4=; b=U85Rz/pYaPFm5+psQMTc9Ooe8EGUgpYuKVza0uZBkWZkNzj2ZBdeEz2qAbM2pTd8ut IepaiB/7Jd2Iru2zh2WgGVy3pA82OvKEFsWRDQkWxjAiJ+yUiBdsgon9oJdmxSIUWdDN oe/flNx89cb8NdgJe6Hs0iOJ2TD7fJQ+s0fYwz/kXwnIEYsalKrR83XpzomRfRx3M6N6 lMn+r7oekYp7Z8e0O+qF/DSO1MOvSunIMaFwi9DVExno4KcEH8npfoZgP4KRttiYXqxO I9YbQZN2h3JxKLYby8x41V3NVgv1C66/lYqrARy0g9Ny00fi6NpwzwKE9zx+eBHXGHpR I/Nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HRC8TEtgimAKP87zZ82d8o/mw+tNM07v5QtYV/gfcl4=; b=WPFx3QAx5Or/2t93ysLEpp5fNM93SK2YqIoIBVBwY14BeoxeUUEy3UhpLU7WdwtiwG QN0Np6WQyrNid6rGsH4VkOcRk+XrYKcx0nndndx7j/itv9KfZRatsrAr6X0NI4JgLuUH VbwysHUsRrumdFMTBppbbMGRLdIQb+IW4szD8vyxrZF1LxqnD44Kc85gFsGTkBJuScZL GO/nPGcwO4CA8TQs6tbn/sdUDt/kts/lTqiLGrb05C5VBreoawkWW14zpOqxPlrDMnMW Cal1xtHu7jXIG+mEEi9xYXkyT4wFEmuTlWhq4rixzKVndanGGv7uHsxZUcUXpDemCRPz U6sQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPhYayfJWSb0gNXirKJ8Yg/ELV8PfAlav+vMmvQtqrqJ5IJ731ienAONXVjjVbULa2wvI43+OW/69qiG3I4GteSP3MNGCTOa9jrb/fk9yA4/D113w= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.92.97 with SMTP id cl1mr77410174oeb.12.1452501688502; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.38.132 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.38.132 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC090902A7D323@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1452496044-17524-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1452496044-17524-2-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC090902A7D323@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:41:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: Vincent JARDIN To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] ixgbe: support UDP tunnel add/del X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:41:29 -0000 > [Wenzhuo] The udp_tunnel_add and udp_tunnel_del have already existed. I just use them. Honestly I agree with you they are not accurate name. Better change them to udp_tunnel_port_add and udp_tunnel_port_del. But it should be a ABI change if I=E2=80=99m not wrong. I think we can announce it this r= elease and change them in the next release. Would you agree? Thanks. Yes you are right.