From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED35A0C4B;
	Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905B440151;
	Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com (mail-lf1-f53.google.com
 [209.85.167.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0529B4014F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id i4so1222102lfv.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 21:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=qYh41UHiSBVKgaf1qa30S5GlKkuMuRIumAVtQszPcpk=;
 b=Jm9EFjLPIk0nRWmtwd+DmUdh1UEPWFqMJeyXn41qFGmVSCIGRO7NXVJeF+AZaPEMUH
 9llDN8vIboVmZeGKMmbqi6PHzbm5+QaCF8MaTTxeOvzjowP/QS3vMcvEt1BUQdcYCLVo
 Bh4RDLslRNvy614Dd9OEm5keLj/7habKAhZ+2kqOOsVLxEapqI1LM/00Py7veOcbavjh
 SInAf03HxUsMiiMByGWy8x5qY/9hlTeHZDSPqFftnk0/as+c6rtrakOAbpL8JUNLBQlT
 eytQKPtvAW3ZaV0lM6sT2OQnZ+r7w9/uta0P9WSUo2LuFMzbYOiBOk3s6WxxfPnNdy99
 3SJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=qYh41UHiSBVKgaf1qa30S5GlKkuMuRIumAVtQszPcpk=;
 b=GQE9DnJHcAGEhiBEBmpOQR+6D60MjwekcgJAh5ahyv1E94czVxl3sQAodJNZEhpJRk
 d5o2JDFgKbubA6l/l+mu/yyg51GPIWqkl2csmFfzrw5keEyveCdRIeGy0HjyLVhVWKXC
 nEjfkJu9iFn7jrcu0M6PjbGCNVnRjowa0/U+sQcxsYp/lMvWYPBNQ+IBd1jNUhJXo2Dn
 t/FH4BZ3Yd9GpPMeag9BrcpxQ3eMmyhRv8fj0psMieGmB082x5fu+6sCtRSspRXE6Ugp
 MUE/B0ELtJig3tgP4RUOYEub1bJSshj3yvW6p6pKWydtuaQcYgU+lWLNqxso7hZn9Bya
 +Kzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tntGuo7dYZxgGIomlYGErZ329AofAqOLOixc43BHHDxME+Lxi
 u0GPEYkoRa3NroEk02IQTVoJbpJu2xJY1R0QCexEhJCtTY8TNw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQZv1MgKaGvXTdefrne6eBPz8E0adcDTW/FKw4+PX5NdSl31pTnzzo15dbaD4mRvNe6RVIB3wDAXRr4AOt06M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1052:: with SMTP id
 c18mr4397540lfb.223.1631509011225; 
 Sun, 12 Sep 2021 21:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Kamaraj P <pkamaraj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:26:40 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG8PAaq2YyX1haU-7LwN2DFeVgYdei2k-o5LBNLNmwSiCWcu=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Max Mbuf Allocation
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello All,

Would like to understand or if there are any guidelines to allocate the max
no of mbuf per NIC ?
For example, if i have defined as below:
#define RX_RING_SIZE 1024
#define TX_RING_SIZE 1024

The Maximum RX/TX queues can be defined as 8 per NIC, What would be the max
no of mbuf can be allocated per NIC ?
Please share if there is any guildliness or any limitation to increase the
mbuf ?

Thanks,
Kamaraj